Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May 15;24(10):1150-63.
doi: 10.1089/scd.2014.0484. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

The role of reactive oxygen species in mesenchymal stem cell adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation: a review

Affiliations
Review

The role of reactive oxygen species in mesenchymal stem cell adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation: a review

Fatemeh Atashi et al. Stem Cells Dev. .

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are promising candidates for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The multipotent stem cell component of MSC isolates is able to differentiate into derivatives of the mesodermal lineage including adipocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes, and myocytes. Many common pathways have been described in the regulation of adipogenesis and osteogenesis. However, stimulation of osteogenesis appears to suppress adipogenesis and vice-versa. Increasing evidence implicates a tight regulation of these processes by reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS are short-lived oxygen-containing molecules that display high chemical reactivity toward DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids. Mitochondrial complexes I and III, and the NADPH oxidase isoform NOX4 are major sources of ROS production during MSC differentiation. ROS are thought to interact with several pathways that affect the transcription machinery required for MSC differentiation including the Wnt, Hedgehog, and FOXO signaling cascades. On the other hand, elevated levels of ROS, defined as oxidative stress, lead to arrest of the MSC cell cycle and apoptosis. Tightly regulated levels of ROS are therefore critical for MSC terminal differentiation, although the precise sources, localization, levels and the exact species of ROS implicated remain to be determined. This review provides a detailed overview of the influence of ROS on adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation in MSCs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS can be intracellulary generated by mitochondria and diverse NOX isoforms, peroxisome, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), xanthine oxidase, and lipogenase. It can also be applied from exogenous sources. Irrespective of its source, it may cause cell proliferation, differentiation, and/or cell cycle arrest, and this effect appears to be concentration dependent. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Mitochondrial ROS production. The production of the superoxide anion, O2•−, by complex I and complex III in the matrix or the inter-membrane space forms H2O2 through the activity of SOD catalase dismutation. H2O2 can then be converted to H2O and O2 by glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and catalase or may play a second messenger role in essential signaling pathways. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
NADPH oxidases. NOX enzymes reduce oxygen to O2•− by using pyridine nucleotide NADPH as an electron donor and molecular oxygen as an electron acceptor. ROS will be generated as the secondary product. A part of O2•− can directly react with nitric oxide (NO) to form a toxic peroxynitrite. It can also be dismutated by superoxide dismutase to form hydrogen peroxide to induce cell signaling cascades or directly react with Fe3+ to form hydroxyl radical. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd
<b>FIG. 4.</b>
FIG. 4.
ROS control signaling cascades involved in osteogenesis/adipogenesis. Wnt/β-catenin, MAPK (NELL-1), and Hh signaling induce osteogenesis while FOXO, PPARγ, and CEBPs signaling stimulate adipogenesis. BMP and IGF signaling have a dual effect in inducing both of these terminal fates. Induction of osteogenesis is optimal in the absence of ROS while induction of adipogenesis is optimal in the presence of ROS. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd
<b>FIG. 5.</b>
FIG. 5.
ROS suppress important osteogenic signaling pathways while they promote adipogenic signaling pathways. Wnt/β-catenin and Hh signaling cascades induce osteogenesis and this is inhibited in the presence of high levels of ROS, which favors adipogenesis. MAPK signaling induces osteogenesis and is stimulated by ROS. In response to oxidative stress, FOXOs are phosphorylated and translocate to the nucleus where they attenuate the transcription of osteogenic genes while inducing adipogenic differentiation. The active form FOXO also induces the regulation of antioxidant and cell cycle arrest genes. The expression of antioxidants also increases adipogenic differentiation. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/scd

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harman D. (1956). Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol 11:298–300 - PubMed
    1. Beckman KB. and Ames BN. (1998). The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol Rev 78:547–581 - PubMed
    1. Guzik TJ. and Harrison DG. (2006). Vascular NADPH oxidases as drug targets for novel antioxidant strategies. Drug Discov Today 11:524–533 - PubMed
    1. Coso S, Harrison I, Harrison CB, Vinh A, Sobey CG, Drummond GR, Williams ED. and Selemidis S. (2012). NADPH oxidases as regulators of tumor angiogenesis: current and emerging concepts. Antioxid Redox Signal 16:1229–1247 - PubMed
    1. Bedard K. and Krause KH. (2007). The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 87:245–313 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances