Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;59(4):2029-36.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.04359-14. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Antimicrobial activity against intraosteoblastic Staphylococcus aureus

Affiliations

Antimicrobial activity against intraosteoblastic Staphylococcus aureus

Florent Valour et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Although Staphylococcus aureus persistence in osteoblasts, partly as small-colony variants (SCVs), can contribute to bone and joint infection (BJI) relapses, the intracellular activity of antimicrobials is not currently considered in the choice of treatment strategies for BJI. Here, antistaphylococcal antimicrobials were evaluated for their intraosteoblastic activity and their impact on the intracellular emergence of SCVs in an ex vivo osteoblast infection model. Osteoblastic MG63 cells were infected for 2 h with HG001 S. aureus. After killing the remaining extracellular bacteria with lysostaphin, infected cells were incubated for 24 h with antimicrobials at the intraosseous concentrations reached with standard therapeutic doses. Intracellular bacteria and SCVs were then quantified by plating cell lysates. A bactericidal effect was observed with fosfomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, oxacillin, rifampin, ofloxacin, and clindamycin, with reductions in the intracellular inocula of -2.5, -3.1, -3.9, -4.2, -4.9, -4.9, and -5.2 log10 CFU/100,000 cells, respectively (P < 10(-4)). Conversely, a bacteriostatic effect was observed with ceftaroline and teicoplanin, whereas vancomycin and daptomycin had no significant impact on intracellular bacterial growth. Ofloxacin, daptomycin, and vancomycin significantly limited intracellular SCV emergence. Overall, ofloxacin was the only molecule to combine an excellent intracellular activity while limiting the emergence of SCVs. These data provide a basis for refining the choice of antibiotics to prioritise in the management of BJI, justifying the combination of a fluoroquinolone for its intracellular activity with an anti-biofilm molecule, such as rifampin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Intraosteoblastic inoculum change and intracellular proportion of small-colony variants in the presence of the main antistaphylococcal molecules at the usual bone concentration. The change in the number of intracellular CFU (Δlog CFU; means and 95% CI) at 2 h, starting from an initial intracellular inoculum of 1.8 × 106 (95% CI =1.4 × 106 to 2.1 × 106) for 100,000 osteoblasts, was compared to untreated cells (Mann-Whitney U-test). CI, confidence interval; SCV, small-colony variants; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.00.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Dose effect of the main antistaphylococcal molecules on intraosteoblastic inoculum. The results are expressed by the change in the number of intracellular CFU (Δlog CFU; means and 95% CI) at 2 h, starting from an initial intracellular inoculum of 1.8 × 106 (95% CI = 1.4 × 106 to 2.1 × 106) for 100,000 osteoblasts. The dose effect was assessed using linear regression between the three used concentrations. CI, confidence interval; *, P < 0.05.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Dose effect of the main antistaphylococcal molecules on the intraosteoblastic emergence of small-colony variants. The change in the number of intracellular CFU (Δlog CFU; means and 95% CI) at 2 h, starting from an initial intracellular inoculum of 1.8 × 106 (95% CI = 1.4 × 106 to 2.1 × 106) for 100,000 osteoblasts, was compared to untreated cells (Mann-Whitney U-test). The dose effect was assessed using linear regression between the three used concentrations. CI, confidence interval; SCV, small-colony variants; *, P < 0.05.

References

    1. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. 2004. Osteomyelitis Lancet 364:369–379. - PubMed
    1. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. 2004. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351:1645–1654. doi:10.1056/NEJMra040181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lowy FD. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:520–532. doi:10.1056/NEJM199808203390806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferry T, Perpoint T, Vandenesch F, Etienne J. 2005. Virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus and their involvement in clinical syndromes. Curr Infect Dis Rep 7:420–428. doi:10.1007/s11908-005-0043-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brady RA, Leid JG, Calhoun JH, Costerton JW, Shirtliff ME. 2008. Osteomyelitis and the role of biofilms in chronic infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 52:13–22. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00357.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances