Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;2(4):279-290.
doi: 10.5455/jbh.20130921013627.

Receptivity and Preferences in Cancer Risk Reduction Lifestyle Programs: A Survey of Colorectal Cancer Family Members

Lisa A Howell  1 , Tabetha A Brockman  2 , Pamela S Sinicrope  3 , Christi A Patten  3 , Paul A Decker  4 , Shawna L Ehlers  1 , Noralane M Lindor  5 , Sandra K Nigon  5 , Gloria M Petersen  6
Affiliations

Receptivity and Preferences in Cancer Risk Reduction Lifestyle Programs: A Survey of Colorectal Cancer Family Members

Lisa A Howell et al. J Behav Health. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Cancer is a shared family experience, and thus the purpose of this study was to assess receptivity and preferences for cancer risk reduction programs among at-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: The sample comprised 401 at-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with CRC from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. In March 2009, respondents completed a mailed survey assessing receptivity and preferences for participating in cancer risk reduction programs and evaluated their relationship to demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables. Multivariable generalized estimating equation approaches were used to model preferences.

Results: Overall, 81% of respondents were receptive to a lifestyle cancer risk reduction program; of these, about half (54%) preferred to participate with their family. Program preferences included: weight management (36%) and nutrition (31%); delivered through the internet (41%) or mail (39%). In a multivariate model, a greater level of concern about cancer (p<0.001), female gender (p=0.002), and higher education (p=0.016) were significantly correlated with willingness to participate in lifestyle programs.

Conclusions: Family members of those with CRC are receptive to cancer risk reduction programs that focus on weight management and nutrition delivered via the internet or mail. Future research is needed to determine how best to incorporate a family-based approach that addresses the cancer experience when designing lifestyle intervention programs.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; family; health behavior change; lifestyle; perceived risk; risk reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lewis FM. The effects of cancer survivorship on families and caregivers. More research is needed on long-term survivors. Am. J. Nurs. 2006;106(3 Suppl):20–25. - PubMed
    1. Sinicrope PS, Vernon SW, Diamond PM, Patten CA, Kelder SH, Rabe KG, Petersen GM. Development and preliminary validation of the cancer family impact scale for colorectal cancer. Genet Test. 2008;12(1):161–169. - PubMed
    1. Hamann HA, Somers TJ, Smith AW, Inslicht SS, Baum A. Posttraumatic stress associated with cancer history and brca1/2 genetic testing. Psychosom. Med. 2005;67:766–772. - PubMed
    1. Rabin C, Rogers ML, Pinto BM, Nash JM, Frierson GM, Trask PC. Effect of personal cancer history and family cancer history on levels of psychological distress. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007;64:411–416. - PubMed
    1. Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG. Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family cancer history of breast cancer. Journal of National Cancer Institute. 1992;84:27–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources