Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Oct;36(5):487-93.
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398749. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis with 3D Ultrasound Angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis with 3D Ultrasound Angiography

J O Pelz et al. Ultraschall Med. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new method of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) angiography of carotid vessels including 3D-US quantification of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (ICAS).

Materials and methods: Two neurologists performed native ultrasound scans of the brain-supplying carotid arteries in 73 probands (including 22 patients with 25 cases of ICAS) using a Toshiba Aplio 500 ultrasound machine equipped with the 3 D application of Curefab CS. Additionally, 25 probands underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the neck vessels.

Results: The mean length of the proximal ICA was 32.1 mm ± 9.8 mm & 31.3 mm ± 9.0 mm (each n = 97). The interrater reliability (intraclass correlation, ICC) was 0.75 ± 0.23 for the common carotid artery (CCA, n = 90) and 0.78 ± 0.21 (n = 92) for the ICA. The intermethod agreement between 3D-US angiography and CE-MRA was 0.67 ± 0.19 (n = 45) & 0.66 ± 0.19 (n = 44) for the CCA and 0.79 ± 0.17 (n = 47) & 0.75 ± 0.19 (n = 46) for the ICA. Quantification of ICAS applying 3D-US in comparison to 2D color-coded duplexsonography (2D-CDS) showed a moderate to good intermethod agreement both by the Bland and Altman analysis and by ICC (0.8 & 0.72; with each p < 0.001). The interrater reliability for quantification of ICAS was 0.79; p < 0.001.

Conclusion: Native 3D-US angiography of carotid vessels shows good interrater and intermethod agreement in comparison to CE-MRA. Together with a moderate to good intermethod and interrater agreement in the quantification of ICAS, when compared to 2D-CDS, 3D-US angiography is thus a promising complementary imaging technique for carotid artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts