Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 21;10(1):e0115813.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115813. eCollection 2015.

Strategies to avoid wrongly labelled genomes using as example the detected wrong taxonomic affiliation for aeromonas genomes in the GenBank database

Affiliations

Strategies to avoid wrongly labelled genomes using as example the detected wrong taxonomic affiliation for aeromonas genomes in the GenBank database

Roxana Beaz-Hidalgo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Around 27,000 prokaryote genomes are presently deposited in the Genome database of GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and this number is exponentially growing. However, it is not known how many of these genomes correspond correctly to their designated taxon. The taxonomic affiliation of 44 Aeromonas genomes (only five of these are type strains) deposited at the NCBI was determined by a multilocus phylogenetic analysis (MLPA) and by pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI). Discordant results in relation to taxa assignation were found for 14 (35.9%) of the 39 non-type strain genomes on the basis of both the MLPA and ANI results. Data presented in this study also demonstrated that if the genome of the type strain is not available, a genome of the same species correctly identified can be used as a reference for ANI calculations. Of the three ANI calculating tools compared (ANI calculator, EzGenome and JSpecies), EzGenome and JSpecies provided very similar results. However, the ANI calculator provided higher intra- and inter-species values than the other two tools (differences within the ranges 0.06-0.82% and 0.92-3.38%, respectively). Nevertheless each of these tools produced the same species classification for the studied Aeromonas genomes. To avoid possible misinterpretations with the ANI calculator, particularly when values are at the borderline of the 95% cutoff, one of the other calculation tools (EzGenome or JSpecies) should be used in combination. It is recommended that once a genome sequence is obtained the correct taxonomic affiliation is verified using ANI or a MLPA before it is submitted to the NCBI and that researchers should amend the existing taxonomic errors present in databases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors confirm that Maria Jose Figueras and Mark Liles are members of the PLOS ONE Editorial Board. However, this does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree constructed with partial sequences of six concatenated housekeeping genes (gyrB, rpoD, recA, dnaJ, gyrA, dnaX, 3879 bp) from 41 Aeromonas genomes (in bold as well as their species affiliation) and from 48 strains representing the 27 species included in the genus.
Sequences of three genomes (Aeromonas sp. 159, A. enteropelogenes (A. trota) 1991CR and A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida 34melT) are not included in the tree as some genes were missing. Abbreviations for the species names: A. hyd., A. hydrophila; A. dhak., A. dhakensis; A. cav., A.caviae; A. jan., A. jandaei; A. ver., A. veronii; A. med., A. media; A. salm., A. salmonicida.

References

    1. Aravena-Román M, Beaz-Hidalgo R, Inglis TJ, Riley TV, Martínez-Murcia AJ et al. (2013) Aeromonas australiensis sp. nov., isolated from irrigation water in Western Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63: 2270–2276. 10.1099/ijs.0.040162-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaz-Hidalgo R, Figueras MJ (2013) Aeromonas spp. whole genomes and virulence factors implicated in fish disease. J Fish Dis 36: 371–388. 10.1111/jfd.12025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaz-Hidalgo R, Martínez-Murcia AJ, Figueras MJ (2013) Reclassification of Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. dhakensis Huys et al. 2002 and Aeromonas aquariorum Martínez-Murcia et al. 2008 as Aeromonas dhakensis sp. nov. comb nov. and emendation of the species Aeromonas hydrophila . Syst Appl Microbiol 36: 171–176. 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen PL, Wu CJ, Chen CS, Tsai PJ, Tang HJ et al. (2013) A comparative study of clinical Aeromonas dhakensis and Aeromonas hydrophila isolates in southern Taiwan: A. dhakensis is more predominant and virulent. Clin Microbiol Infect 20: O428–O434. - PubMed
    1. Chun J, Rainey FA (2014) Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64: 316–324. 10.1099/ijs.0.054171-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources