Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 22:13:2.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0205-1.

Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes

Affiliations

Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes

Kara Schick-Makaroff et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile devices are increasingly being used for data collection in research. However, many researchers do not have experience in collecting data electronically. Hence, the purpose of this short report was to identify issues that emerged in a study that incorporated electronic capture of patient-reported outcomes in clinical settings, and strategies used to address the issues.

Findings: The issues pertaining to electronic patient-reported outcome data collection were captured qualitatively during a study on use of electronic patient-reported outcomes in two home dialysis units. Fifty-six patients completed three surveys on tablet computers, including the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, and a satisfaction measure. Issues that arose throughout the research process were recorded during ethics reviews, implementation process, and data collection. Four core issues emerged including logistics of technology, security, institutional and financial support, and electronic design.

Conclusions: Although use of mobile devices for data collection has many benefits, it also poses new challenges for researchers. Advance consideration of possible issues that emerge in the process, and strategies that can help address these issues, may prevent disruption and enhance validity of findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Basch E, Goldfarb S. Electronic patient-reported outcomes for collecting sensitive information from patients. J Support Oncol. 2009;7:98–99. - PubMed
    1. Dupont A, Wheeler J, Herndon JE, II, Coan A, Zafar SY, Hood L, Patwardhan M, Shaw HS, Lynerly HK, Abernethy AP. Use of tablet personal computers for sensitive patient-reported information. J Support Oncol. 2009;7:91–97. - PubMed
    1. Smith SK, Rowe K, Abernethy AP. Use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement system to improve distress management in oncology. Palliat Support Care. 2014;12:69–73. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000345. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zbrozek A, Hebert J, Gogates G, Thorell R, Dell C, Molsen E, Craig G, Grice K, Kern S, Hines S. Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data – Recommendations for clinical trial teams: Report of the ISPOR ePRO Systems Validation Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16:48–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abernethy AP, Ahmad A, Zafar SY, Wheeler JL, Reese JB, Lynerly HK. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Med Care. 2010;48(Suppl 1):S32–S38. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181db53a4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types