Single-site robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer: a pilot study
- PMID: 25609162
- PMCID: PMC4302287
- DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.62
Single-site robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer: a pilot study
Abstract
Objective: To discuss the feasibility of single-site robotic surgery for benign gynecologic tumors and early stage gynecologic cancers.
Methods: In this single institution, prospective analysis, we analyzed six patients who had undergone single-site robotic surgery between December 2013 and August 2014. Surgery was performed using the da Vinci Si Surgical System. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Single-site robotic surgery was performed successfully in all six cases. The median patient age was 48 years, and the median body mass index was 25.5 kg/m² (range, 22 to 33 kg/m²). The median total operative time was 211 minutes, and the median duration of intracorporeal vaginal cuff suturing was 32 minutes (range, 22 to 47 minutes). The median duration of pelvic lymph node dissection was 31 minutes on one side and 27 minutes on the other side. Patients' postoperative courses were uneventful. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days. No postoperative complications occurred.
Conclusion: When used to treat benign gynecologic tumors and early stage gynecologic cancers, the single-site da Vinci robotic surgery is feasible, safe, and produces favorable surgical outcomes.
Keywords: Gynecology; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Operation Time; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedure; Single-site.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers.J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;29(1):e2. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e2. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29185260 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25088863
-
Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 1. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27815041
-
Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31715304
-
Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Jun;46(6):828-843. doi: 10.1111/jog.14228. Epub 2020 May 14. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020. PMID: 32410262 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):593-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2869-4. Epub 2015 Oct 29. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26514118
-
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0755-4. Epub 2017 Oct 13. J Robot Surg. 2018. PMID: 29027639
-
Robotic transumbilical single-site re-staging surgery of ovarian granulosa cell tumor - case report and technical points with video.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 21;87(4):2358-2361. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002862. eCollection 2025 Apr. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40212140 Free PMC article.
-
Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.F1000Res. 2016 Sep 26;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-2373. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9389.1. eCollection 2016. F1000Res. 2016. PMID: 27746895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robot-Assisted Surgery in the Treatment of Gynecological Carcinoma and Malignancies: Introduction to the da Vinci Robotic Surgery System.Cureus. 2023 Aug 6;15(8):e43035. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43035. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37674962 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, et al. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:389–393. - PubMed