Modulation of bone's sensitivity to low-intensity vibrations by acceleration magnitude, vibration duration, and number of bouts
- PMID: 25614140
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-3018-5
Modulation of bone's sensitivity to low-intensity vibrations by acceleration magnitude, vibration duration, and number of bouts
Abstract
Variables defining vibration-based biomechanical treatments were tested by their ability to affect the musculoskeleton in the growing mouse. Duration of a vibration bout, but not variations in vibration intensity or number of vibration bouts per day, was identified as modulator of trabecular bone formation rates.
Introduction: Low-intensity vibrations (LIV) may enhance musculoskeletal properties, but little is known regarding the role that individual LIV variables play. We determined whether acceleration magnitude and/or the number and duration of daily loading bouts may modulate LIV efficacy.
Methods: LIV was applied to 8-week-old mice at either 0.3 g or 0.6 g for three weeks; the number of daily bouts was one, two, or four, and the duration of a single bout was 15, 30, or 60 min. A frequency of 45 Hz was used throughout.
Results: LIV induced tibial cortical surface strains in 4-month-old mice of approximately 10 με at 0.3 g and 30 με at 0.6 g. In trabecular bone of the proximal tibial metaphysis, all single daily bout signal combinations with the exception of a single 15 min daily bout at 0.3 g (i.e., single bouts of 30 and 60 min at 0.3 g and 15 and 30 min at 0.6 g) produced greater bone formation rates (BFR/BS) than in controls. Across all signal combinations, 30 and 60 min bouts were significantly more effective than 15 min bouts in raising BFR/BS above control levels. Increasing the number of daily bouts or partitioning a single daily bout into several shorter bouts did not potentiate efficacy and in some instances led to BFR/BS that was not significantly different from those in controls. Bone chemical and muscle properties were similar across all groups.
Conclusions: These data may provide a basis towards optimization of LIV efficacy and indicate that in the growing mouse skeleton, increasing bout duration from 15 to 30 or 60 min positively influences BFR/BS.
Similar articles
-
Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton.Bone. 2006 Nov;39(5):1059-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 7. Bone. 2006. PMID: 16824816
-
Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading.J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Aug;15(8):1596-602. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1596. J Bone Miner Res. 2000. PMID: 10934659
-
Mice lacking thrombospondin 2 show an atypical pattern of endocortical and periosteal bone formation in response to mechanical loading.Bone. 2006 Mar;38(3):310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.08.027. Epub 2005 Nov 14. Bone. 2006. PMID: 16290255
-
Regulation of mechanical signals in bone.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009 May;12(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01442.x. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009. PMID: 19419452 Review.
-
Is bone formation induced by high-frequency mechanical signals modulated by muscle activity?J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2010 Mar;10(1):3-11. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2010. PMID: 20190375 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of high-frequency vibration on orthodontic tooth movement and bone density.J Orthod Sci. 2019 Aug 8;8:15. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_17_19. eCollection 2019. J Orthod Sci. 2019. PMID: 31497574 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical, biophysical and biochemical modulators of cytoskeletal remodelling and emergent stem cell lineage commitment.Commun Biol. 2023 Jan 19;6(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04320-w. Commun Biol. 2023. PMID: 36658332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cytoskeletal Configuration Modulates Mechanically Induced Changes in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenesis, Morphology, and Stiffness.Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 6;6:34791. doi: 10.1038/srep34791. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27708389 Free PMC article.
-
Differential Efficacy of 2 Vibrating Orthodontic Devices to Alter the Cellular Response in Osteoblasts, Fibroblasts, and Osteoclasts.Dose Response. 2018 Aug 16;16(3):1559325818792112. doi: 10.1177/1559325818792112. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep. Dose Response. 2018. PMID: 30397398 Free PMC article.
-
Vibration Therapy to Prevent Bone Loss and Falls: Mechanisms and Efficacy.Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015 Dec;13(6):381-9. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0294-8. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015. PMID: 26456496 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources