Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;137(1):EL44-50.
doi: 10.1121/1.4903916.

Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities

Affiliations

Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities

Eriko Atagi et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Enhancement of the perceptual encoding of talker characteristics (indexical information) in speech can facilitate listeners' recognition of linguistic content. The present study explored this indexical-linguistic relationship in nonnative speech processing by examining listeners' performance on two tasks: nonnative accent categorization and nonnative speech-in-noise recognition. Results indicated substantial variability across listeners in their performance on both the accent categorization and nonnative speech recognition tasks. Moreover, listeners' accent categorization performance correlated with their nonnative speech-in-noise recognition performance. These results suggest that having more robust indexical representations for nonnative accents may allow listeners to more accurately recognize the linguistic content of nonnative speech.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean accuracies for the accent categorization and nonnative speech-in-noise transcription tasks, plotted for each talker (A on left) and for each listener (B on right). In (A), each point represents a talker and is identified with the initial letter of the talker's native language followed by a number (1–4). Talkers identified by number 1 or 2 are male talkers; talkers identified by number 3 or 4 are female talkers. (Examples: F1 is a French male; M4 is a Mandarin female.) In (B), each point is a listener.

References

    1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics ( Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago: ).
    1. Atagi, E. , and Bent, T. (2013). “ Auditory free classification of nonnative speech,” J. Phon. 41, 509–51910.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bamford, J. , and Wilson, I. (1979). “ Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists,” in Speech-hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-impaired Children, edited by Bench J. and Bamford J. ( Academic, London: ), pp. 148–187.
    1. Bent, T. (2014). “ Children's perception of foreign-accented words,” J. Child Lang. 41, 1334–135510.1017/S0305000913000457 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borrie, S. A. , McAuliffe, M. J. , Liss, J. M. , O'Beirne, G. A. , and Anderson, T. J. (2013). “ The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 474–48210.1121/1.4770239 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources