Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Mar;17(3):183-92.
doi: 10.1111/jch.12474. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil with or without chlorthalidone during and after 8 months of treatment for hypertension

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil with or without chlorthalidone during and after 8 months of treatment for hypertension

Mark S Kipnes et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Mar.

Abstract

A phase 3, 26-week, open-label, titrate-to-target study (n=418) assessed the safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) alone and with chlorthalidone (CLD), followed by a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled reversal phase with change in clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as the primary endpoint. Target blood pressure (BP) was <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg with diabetes/chronic kidney disease). AZL-M was initiated at 40 mg once a day (QD), force-titrated to 80 mg at week 4. CLD 25 mg QD could be added (weeks 8-22), if required, to reach target, followed by additional antihypertensives from week 12. At the end of the open-label phase, mean change in systolic BP (SBP)/DBP from baseline was -23/-16 mm Hg. The most common adverse events, irrespective of treatment, were dizziness (8.9%) and headache (7.2%). Serious AEs were reported in eight patients (1.9%). Consecutive creatinine elevations ≥50% with values exceeding the upper limit of normal (ULN) were reported in nine (2.2%) patients. All returned to below the 50% threshold; most also returned to below the ULN after drug discontinuation. Mean DBP was maintained through the reversal phase in patients receiving AZL-M, but increased with placebo (difference: -7.8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, -9.8 to -5.8; P<.001). AZL-M alone or with CLD showed good long-term safety and stable BP improvements in a titrate-to-target approach. BP improvements caused by AZL-M therapy were safely reversible upon AZL-M withdrawal.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00696384.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design for the open‐label phase and double‐blind reversal phase. AZL‐M indicates azilsartan medoxomil; QD, once daily; CLD, chlorthalidone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean trough clinic sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (A) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (B) by study visit (open‐label phase; last observation carried forward). Note that the individual data lines do not represent randomized groups and are in a single cohort, but are presented separately according to treatment received for clarity. AZL‐M indicates azilsartan medoxomil; CLD, chlorthalidone. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. The dashed line at week 8 represents the first visit at which patients could additionally have received CLD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean trough clinic sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (A) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (B) by study visit (double‐blind reversal phase; last observation carried forward). AZL‐M indicates azilsartan medoxomil; CLD, chlorthalidone. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.

References

    1. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) Tablets. U.S. Prescribing Information. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA. Jul 2004. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/200796s006lbl.pdf. Accessed October 13, 2014.
    1. Takeda Pharma A/S. Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) Tablets. Summary of Product Characteristics . Takeda Pharma A/S, Taastrup, Denmark. Oct 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR__Product_Infor.... Accessed October 13, 2014.
    1. Zaiken K, Cheng JW. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin receptor blocker. Clin Ther. 2011;33:1577–1589. - PubMed
    1. De Caterina AR, Harper AR, Cuculi F. Critical evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:299–305. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurtz TW, Kajiya T. Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:133–143. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data