Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 1;37(3):597-609.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Effects of eliminating drug caps on racial differences in antidepressant use among dual enrollees with diabetes and depression

Affiliations

Effects of eliminating drug caps on racial differences in antidepressant use among dual enrollees with diabetes and depression

Alyce S Adams et al. Clin Ther. .

Abstract

Purpose: Black patients with diabetes are at greater risk of underuse of antidepressants even when they have equal access to health insurance. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of removing a significant financial barrier to prescription medications (drug caps) on existing black-white disparities in antidepressant treatment rates among patients with diabetes and comorbid depression.

Methods: We used an interrupted time series with comparison series design and a 5% representative sample of all fee-for-service Medicare and Medicaid dual enrollees to evaluate the removal of drug caps on monthly antidepressant treatment rates. We evaluated the impact of drug cap removal on racial gaps in treatment by modeling the month-to-month white-black difference in use within age strata (younger than 65 years of age or 65 years of age or older). We compared adult dual enrollees with diabetes and comorbid depression living in states with strict drug caps (n = 221) and those without drug caps (n = 1133) before the policy change. Our primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients with any antidepressant use per month and the mean standardized monthly doses (SMDs) of antidepressants per month.

Findings: The removal of drug caps in strict drug cap states was associated with a sudden increase in the proportion of patients treated for depression (4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.03-0.05, P < 0.0001) and in the intensity of antidepressant use (SMD: 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.07, P < 0.001). Although antidepressant treatment rates increased for both white and black patients, the white-black treatment gap increased immediately after Part D (0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08) and grew over time (0.04 percentage points per month; 95% CI, 0.002-0.01; P < 0.001).

Implications: Policies that remove financial barriers to medications may increase depression treatment rates among patients with diabetes overall while exacerbating treatment disparities. Tailored outreach may be needed to address nonfinancial barriers to mental health services use among black patients with diabetes.

Keywords: access to care; comorbidity; diabetes; disparities; health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest that could inappropriately influence this work. The study finders had not role in the design, collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria and impact on sample size.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Changes in the Prevalence of Antidepressant Use Before and After Part D by Drug Cap Status*
*Monthly Prevalence (A) and Intensity of Antidepressant Use (B) Before and After the Transition from Medicaid to Part D among Dual Enrollees with Diabetes and Co-Morbid Major Depression in Strict Drug Cap Compared to No Drug Cap States; Solid black circle=observations in drug cap states; solid black line=estimated utilization in drug cap states from time series models; Black dashed line=predicted utilization in drug cap states based on baseline trends; Open grey circle=observations in non-drug cap states; solid grey line=estimated utilization in non-drug cap states from time series models; Black dashed line=predicted utilization in non-drug cap states based on baseline trends
Figure 3
Figure 3. Changes in the Prevalence and Intensity of Antidepressant Use among Dual Enrollees Pre and Post Part D in States with Drug Cap by Race*
*Monthly Prevalence (A) and Intensity of Antidepressant Use (B) Before and After the Transition from Medicaid to Part D among Black and White Dual Enrollees with Diabetes and Co-Morbid Major Depression in Strict Drug Cap States Only; Solid black diamond=observed utilization of black patients; solid black line=estimated utilization for black patients from time series model; Open grey square=observed utilization of white patients; solid grey line=estimated utilization for white patients from time series model; dotted black line=estimated difference in utilization between whites and blacks from time series models

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1033–1046. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong MD, Shapiro MF, Boscardin WJ, Ettner SL. Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 14;347(20):1585–92. - PubMed
    1. Ward BW, Schiller JS. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:120203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1069–1078. - PubMed
    1. Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE. Depression and diabetes: Impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3278–3285. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances