Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;67(Suppl 1):86-90.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-014-0783-6. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

Prognostic value of frozen section in t1, t2 carcinoma of oral cavity

Affiliations

Prognostic value of frozen section in t1, t2 carcinoma of oral cavity

Sandhya Gokavarapu et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Complex anatomy of oral cavity makes it difficult for a surgeon to assess margins of oral cancer accurately and positive margins compromise loco regional disease control, thus surgeon may rely on frozen section assessment for marginal status. We discussed the prognostic value of frozen section in early carcinoma of oral cavity. 90 patients with pT1 and pT2 oral cavity cancer operated from January 2010 to December 2011 under single consultant surgeon were retrospectively evaluated. Log rank test and multivariate cox regression model was used for testing frozen section against the survival and recurrence free status. Survival of patients with positive or negative frozen section was significant (p = 0.037), Survival of patients with positive or negative histology report was significant (p = 0.004), however; prognosis of patients with positive margins despite revision under frozen control was poorer to the patients with negative margin. Frozen section assessment is accurate but their use in the surgery of oral cavity cancer might not improve loco regional disease control or survival when used routinely.

Keywords: Frozen section; Histopathology; Locoregional recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall survival—frozen section
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall survival—histopathology

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaufman Z, Lew S, Griffel B, et al. Frozen-section diagnosisin surgical pathology: a prospective analysis of 526 frozen sections. Cancer. 1986;57:377. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<377::AID-CNCR2820570231>3.0.CO;2-M. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers C, Klatt EC, Chandrasoma P. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in a teaching hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987;111:514. - PubMed
    1. Howanitz PJ, Hoffman GG, Zarbo RJ. The accuracy of frozen section diagnoses in 34 hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114:355. - PubMed
    1. Ord Robert A, Aisner S. Accuracy of frozen sections in assessing margins in oral cancer resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:663–669. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90570-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batsakis JG. Surgical excision margins: a pathologist’s perspective. Adv Anat Pathol. 1999;6:140–148. doi: 10.1097/00125480-199905000-00002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources