Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Jan 26;10(1):e0116908.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116908. eCollection 2015.

Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management

Benjamin S R Allin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify methods of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, using a systematic review of gastroschisis management as an example.

Background: Operative primary fascial closure (OPFC), and silo placement with staged reduction and delayed closure (SR) are the most commonly used methods of gastroschisis closure. Relative merits of each are unclear.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing outcomes following OPFC and SR in infants with simple gastroschisis. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospitalization and time to full enteral feeding.

Results: 751 unique articles were identified. Eight met the inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials. 488 infants underwent OPFC and 316 underwent SR. Multiple studies were excluded because they included heterogeneous populations and mixed intervention groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in the SR group (mean difference 8.97 days, 95% CI 2.14-15.80 days), as was number of post-operative days to complete enteral feeding (mean difference 7.19 days, 95%CI 2.01-12.36 days). Mortality was not statistically significantly different, although the odds of death were raised in the SR group (OR 1.96, 95%CI 0.71-5.35).

Conclusions: Despite showing some benefit of OPFC over SR, our results are tempered by the low quality of the available studies, which were small and variably reported. Coordinating research through a National Paediatric Surgical Trials Unit could alleviate many of these problems. A similar national approach could be used in other smaller surgical specialties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plots showing the effect of SR on primary outcome measures.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plots showing the effect of SR on key secondary outcome measures.

References

    1. Keys C, Drewett M, Burge DM (2008) Gastroschisis: the cost of an epidemic. J Pediatr Surg 43: 654–657. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owen A, Marven S, Johnson P, Kurinczuk J, Spark P, et al. (2010) Gastroschisis: A national cohort study to describe contemporary surgical strategies and outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 45: 1808–1816. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.01.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bianchi A, Dickson AP (1998) Elective delayed reduction and no anesthesia: ‘minimal intervention management’ for gastrochisis. J Pediatr Surg 33: 1338–1340. 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90002-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owen A, Marven S, Jackson L, Antao B, Roberts J, et al. (2006) Experience of bedside preformed silo staged reduction and closure for gastroschisis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 41: 1830–1835. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lobo JD, Kim AC, Davis RP, Segura BJ, Alpert H, et al. (2010) No free ride? The hidden costs of delayed operative management using a spring-loaded silo for gastroschisis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 45: 1426–1432. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.047 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types