Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;28(2):74-86.
doi: 10.1002/jmr.2413. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Conformational frustration in calmodulin-target recognition

Affiliations

Conformational frustration in calmodulin-target recognition

Swarnendu Tripathi et al. J Mol Recognit. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Calmodulin (CaM) is a primary calcium (Ca(2+) )-signaling protein that specifically recognizes and activates highly diverse target proteins. We explored the molecular basis of target recognition of CaM with peptides representing the CaM-binding domains from two Ca(2+) -CaM-dependent kinases, CaMKI and CaMKII, by employing experimentally constrained molecular simulations. Detailed binding route analysis revealed that the two CaM target peptides, although similar in length and net charge, follow distinct routes that lead to a higher binding frustration in the CaM-CaMKII complex than in the CaM-CaMKI complex. We discovered that the molecular origin of the binding frustration is caused by intermolecular contacts formed with the C-domain of CaM that need to be broken before the formation of intermolecular contacts with the N-domain of CaM. We argue that the binding frustration is important for determining the kinetics of the recognition process of proteins involving large structural fluctuations.

Keywords: binding frustration; binding route analysis; calmodulin; calmodulin-binding targets; coarse-grained molecular simulations; protein-protein association; target recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Native structures of the CaM-CaMBT complexes (A) and (B) show the PDB structures of the CaM-CaMKI (PDB ID: 2L7L) (Gifford et al. 2011) and CaM-CaMKII (PDB ID: 1CDM) (Meador et al. 1993) complexes. Helices and the Ca2+-binding loops of CaM are denoted by A-H and I-IV, respectively in (A) and (B). CaM is colored red (N-terminal domain) and blue (C-terminal domain) and the Ca2+ ions are represented with yellow spheres. The CaMKI and CaMKII peptides are shown in green. The sequence of CaMKI and CaMKII are indicated below (A) and (B), respectively with one letter code. The hydrophobic residues of the CaMBTs from the hydrophobic motifs (1-5-10 and 1-14 for CaMKI and 1-5-10 for CaMKII) in both the sequences are colored in red.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interactions between the CaM domains and the CaMBTs during association. (A), (B) and (C) represent three successful trajectories for the association of CaM-CaMKI projected on the 2D distribution (in log-scale) –ln P(Zn, Zc) of all the trajectories. Similarly, (D), (E) and (F) are for CaM-CaMKII. The trajectories are colored by a normalized time from blue to red. The 2D distribution is colored from black to white proportional to the population (from high to low). See the Models and Method section for the definition of Zn and Zc. The basins (I and II in A–C for CaM-CaMKI, and I′ and II′ in D–F for CaM-CaMKII) are indicated by the black arrows.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The binding route analysis on the trajectories from the successful associations between CaM and the CaMBTs. (A) and (B) illustrate the formation of the normalized intermolecular contacts Zn¯ and Zc¯ from the N- and C-terminal domain of CaM compared to the average (normalized) and the targets CaMKI and CaMKII, respectively. For both systems is defined as the total number of intermolecular contacts between CaM and the target, such that Z¯=Zn+Zc¯. See the Models and Method section for a detailed discussion on , Zn¯ and Zc¯. In each plot, the diagonal line is drawn as a reference for the intermolecular contacts Zn¯ or Zc¯ that ideally follow the average . The vertical dashed lines in the plots indicate the values of for which the corresponding values of Zn¯ and Zc¯ differ significantly during the association for both systems.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Probability of contact formation between CaM and CaMKI along the binding route. (A), (B) and (C) represent the contact maps calculated between the amino acids from the side-chain of CaM and CaMKI, at the different values of ~0.3, 0.6 and 0.8 (as indicated in Fig. 3 (A)), respectively. A linearized model of CaM is shown below the plots with the individual helices displayed as cylinders, the linkers connecting the helices shown as lines, and the N-terminal and C-terminal helices are shown in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Probability of contact formation between CaM and CaMKII along the binding route. (A), (B) and (C) represent the contact maps calculated between the amino acids from the side-chain of CaM and CaMKII, at the different values of ~0.2, 0.3 and 0.6 (as indicated in Fig. 3(B)), respectively. A linearized model of CaM is shown below the plots with the individual helices displayed as cylinders, the linkers connecting the helices shown as lines, and the N-terminal and C-terminal helices are shown in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Conformational frustration in CaM-CaMBT recognition. (A), (B) and (C) represent the schematic diagram of CaM-CaMBT association process along the binding route (see Fig. 3). The unstructured CaMBT (CaMKI or CaMKII) initially interacts with one of the domain of CaM (predominantly the cCaM). At the early stage of association (from A to B) the conformational frustration comes into play as the CaMBT starts to interact with the other domain of CaM (predominantly the nCaM). The conformational frustration at the late stage (from B to C) occurs, as the CaMBT approaches towards the binding pocket of CaM. As a result, intermolecular contacts between CaM and CaMBT are either broken or new intermolecular contacts are formed. In the schematic diagram of CaM the number 1-4 denotes the four EF-hands. The BC and FG helix-linkers of CaM are represented by the dotted lines in red and blue, respectively. Yellow spheres denote positions of four Ca2+ ions. The binding loops of CaM are not shown. The ensemble of CaMBT structures is shown in green.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Difference in the intermolecular contact probability of the residues from the CaMBTs along the binding route at the early stage of association. (A) Difference in the contact probability (ΔPi) for each residue of CaMKI, at ~0.3 and ~0.6 (see Fig. 3A in the Main text). (B) ΔPi for each residue of CaMKII, at ~0.2 and ~0.3 (see Fig. 3B in the Main text). The sequences of CaMBTs are shown on top of each plot. The first hydrophobic residues from the binding motif of the CaMBTs are shown in green (W303 from CaMKI and L299 from CaMKII).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alsallaq R, Zhou HX. Energy landscape and transition state of protein-protein association. Biophys J. 2007a;92(5):1486–1502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsallaq R, Zhou HX. Prediction of protein-protein association rates from a transition-state theory. Structure. 2007b;15(2):215–224. - PubMed
    1. Alsallaq R, Zhou HX. Electrostatic rate enhancement and transient complex of protein-protein association. Proteins. 2008;71(1):320–335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anthis NJ, Doucleff M, Clore GM. Transient, Sparsely Populated Compact States of Apo and Calcium-Loaded Calmodulin Probed by Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement: Interplay of Conformational Selection and Induced Fit. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(46):18966–18974. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbato G, Ikura M, Kay LE, Pastor RW, Bax A. Backbone dynamics of calmodulin studied by 15N relaxation using inverse detected two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy: the central helix is flexible. Biochemistry. 1992;31(23):5269–78. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources