How do integrated health care systems address racial and ethnic disparities in colon cancer?
- PMID: 25624437
- PMCID: PMC4348634
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8642
How do integrated health care systems address racial and ethnic disparities in colon cancer?
Abstract
Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) disparities have persisted over the last two decades. CRC is a complex disease requiring multidisciplinary care from specialists who may be geographically separated. Few studies have assessed the association between integrated health care system (IHS) CRC care quality, survival, and disparities. The purpose of this study was to determine if exposure to an IHS positively affects quality of care, risk of mortality, and disparities.
Patients and methods: This retrospective secondary-data analysis study, using the California Cancer Registry linked to state discharge abstracts of patients treated for colon cancer (2001 to 2006), compared the rates of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-based care, the hazard of mortality, and racial/ethnic disparities in an IHS versus other settings.
Results: More than 30,000 patient records were evaluated. The IHS had overall higher rates of adherence to NCCN guidelines. Propensity score-matched Cox models showed an independent and protective association between care in the IHS and survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.90). This advantage persisted across stage groups. Black race was associated with increased hazard of mortality in all other settings (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.27); however, there was no disparity within the IHS for any minority group (P > .11 for all groups) when compared with white race.
Conclusion: The IHS delivered higher rates of evidence-based care and was associated with lower 5-year mortality. Racial/ethnic disparities in survival were absent in the IHS. Integrated systems may serve as the cornerstone for developing accountable care organizations poised to improve cancer outcomes and eliminate disparities under health care reform.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at
Figures
Comment in
-
Putting the integration into integrated health care systems.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):821-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.6015. Epub 2015 Jan 26. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25624433 No abstract available.
-
Reply to M.H. Kanter et al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3519. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5640. Epub 2015 Jul 27. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26215958 No abstract available.
-
Integration Alone Does Not Reduce Health Care Disparities.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3519. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5047. Epub 2015 Jul 27. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26215965 No abstract available.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2013. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/docume....
-
- Rhoads KF, Cullen J, Ngo JV, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in lymph node examination after colon cancer resection do not completely explain disparities in mortality. Cancer. 2012;118:469–477. - PubMed
-
- Cunningham JE, Butler WM. Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: Clinical evidence for a biological basis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88:161–176. - PubMed
-
- Patel MI, Ma Y, Mitchell BS, et al. Understanding disparities in leukemia: A national study. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:1831–1837. - PubMed
