Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials
- PMID: 25624439
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334
Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials
Abstract
Purpose: Information about symptomatic toxicities of anticancer treatments is not based on direct report by patients, but rather on reports by clinicians in trials. Given the potential for under-reporting, our aim was to compare reporting by patients and physicians of six toxicities (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and hair loss) within three randomized trials.
Patients and methods: In one trial, elderly patients with breast cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy; in two trials, patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received first-line treatment. Toxicity was prospectively collected by investigators (graded by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0] or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3]). At the end of each cycle, patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires, including toxicity-related symptom items. Possible answers were "not at all," "a little," "quite a bit," and "very much." Analysis was limited to the first three cycles. For each toxicity, agreement between patients and physicians and under-reporting by physicians (ie, toxicity reported by patients but not reported by physicians) were calculated.
Results: Overall, 1,090 patients (2,482 cycles) were included. Agreement between patients and physicians was low for all toxicities. Toxicity rates reported by physicians were always lower than those reported by patients. For patients who reported toxicity (any severity), under-reporting by physicians ranged from 40.7% to 74.4%. Examining only patients who reported "very much" toxicity, under-reporting by physicians ranged from 13.0% to 50.0%.
Conclusion: Subjective toxicities are at high risk of under-reporting by physicians, even when prospectively collected within randomized trials. This strongly supports the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into toxicity reporting in clinical trials.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00331097 NCT00349219 NCT00385606.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Doctors less likely than patients to report toxicity of cancer treatments, study shows.BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h485. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 25630342 No abstract available.
-
Side-effects of cancer drugs are under-reported in trials.Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):e107. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70023-9. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25639368 No abstract available.
-
Reply to P. Baldo et al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2826. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5699. Epub 2015 Jul 20. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26195706 No abstract available.
-
Toxicities and Adverse Drug Reactions Experienced During Anticancer Treatment: It Is Desirable to Consider the Problem Within the International System of Pharmacovigilance.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2824-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.7613. Epub 2015 Jul 20. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26195718 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical