Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy
- PMID: 25625538
- DOI: 10.1111/den.12447
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy
Comment in
-
Reply to letter: Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy.Dig Endosc. 2015 May;27(4):533. doi: 10.1111/den.12459. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Dig Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25676836 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis.Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(1):8-15. doi: 10.1111/den.12399. Epub 2014 Dec 4. Dig Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25369736
References
-
- Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Sagara S, Kanai T, Yahagi N. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis. Dig. Endosc. 2015; 27: 8-15.
-
- Akarsu Ayazoğlu T, Polat E, Bolat C et al. Comparison of propofol-based sedation regimens administered during colonoscopy. Rev. Med. Chil. 2013; 141: 477-485.
-
- Jalowiecki P, Rudner R, Gonciarz M, Kawecki P, Petelenz M, Dziurdzik P. Sole use of dexmedetomidine has limited utility for conscious sedation during outpatient colonoscopy. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 269-273.
-
- Pereira TV, Horwitz RI, Ioannidis JP. Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions. JAMA 2012; 308: 1676-1684.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
