Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;135(2):553-560.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001115.

Frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis: a long-term review

Affiliations

Frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis: a long-term review

Ivo Gwanmesia et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis is known to produce significant functional and aesthetic gains in the short and medium term. Little is known about the long-term effects of this technique. The authors present a long-term review of frontofacial advancement by distraction in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Methods: In 2008, Witherow et al. presented functional outcomes in 20 consecutive patients who underwent frontofacial advancement by distraction osteogenesis using the rigid external distractor frame. This retrospective study has revisited the outcomes in these patients after a mean follow-up period of 10.2 years.

Results: Records for the original 20 patients were assessed. Cephalometric analysis demonstrated stable advancements over the long term. No patient achieved any anterior growth of the midface after frontofacial advancement. Long-term follow-up demonstrated a later deterioration of respiratory function in the younger group of patients (36.4 percent). Four patients required adenotonsillectomy. One patient has a persistent tracheostomy. Only one patient required further procedures to correct recurrent raised intracranial pressure. None of the patients in the older group experienced a deterioration of function. Other procedures included reduction of the supraorbital ridge, bimaxillary osteotomies, and rhinoplasties.

Conclusions: Frontofacial distraction produced long-term stable advancement in all cases, and 15 of the 17 living patients (88.2 percent) achieved stable functional gains. Anterior growth of the midface does not occur following monobloc distraction. Deterioration in function is seen in those who undergo this procedure at a young age. The authors recommend regular follow-up of these patients.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Witherow H, Dunaway D, Evans R, et al. Functional outcomes in monobloc advancement by distraction using the rigid external distractor device. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1311–1322
    1. Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Havlik RJ, Cohen SR, Holmes MD. Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: Problems and solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1797–1808
    1. Bradley JP, Gabbay JS, Taub PJ, et al. Monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis decreases morbidity and relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1585–1597
    1. Tessier P. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis: Crouzon’s and Apert’s diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:419–442
    1. Murray JE, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB, Belfer M. Twenty year experience in maxillocraniofacial surgery: An evaluation of early surgery on growth, function and body image. Ann Surg. 1979;190:320–331

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources