Robotic surgery
- PMID: 25627128
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9711
Robotic surgery
Abstract
Background: Proficiency in minimally invasive surgery requires intensive and continuous training, as it is technically challenging for unnatural visual and haptic perceptions. Robotic and computer sciences are producing innovations to augment the surgeon's skills to achieve accuracy and high precision during complex surgery. This article reviews the current use of robotically assisted surgery, focusing on technology as well as main applications in digestive surgery, and future perspectives.
Methods: The PubMed database was interrogated to retrieve evidence-based data on surgical applications. Internal and external consulting with key opinion leaders, renowned robotics laboratories and robotic platform manufacturers was used to produce state-of-the art business intelligence around robotically assisted surgery.
Results: Selected digestive procedures (oesophagectomy, gastric bypass, pancreatic and liver resections, rectal resection for cancer) might benefit from robotic assistance, although the current level of evidence is insufficient to support widespread adoption. The surgical robotic market is growing, and a variety of projects have recently been launched at both academic and corporate levels to develop lightweight, miniaturized surgical robotic prototypes.
Conclusion: The magnified view, and improved ergonomics and dexterity offered by robotic platforms, might facilitate the uptake of minimally invasive procedures. Image guidance to complement robotically assisted procedures, through the concepts of augmented reality, could well represent a major revolution to increase safety and deal with difficulties associated with the new minimally invasive approaches.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Robotic foregut surgery.Int J Med Robot. 2006 Dec;2(4):287-92. doi: 10.1002/rcs.108. Int J Med Robot. 2006. PMID: 17520645 Review.
-
Next-generation robotic surgery--from the aspect of surgical robots developed by industry.Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Feb;24(1):2-7. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.1003140. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015. PMID: 25627433 Review.
-
Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future.Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.019. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16023438 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology.Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):922-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.020. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 25274485 Review.
-
Future of robotic surgery.Cancer J. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):109-19. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31828bf822. Cancer J. 2013. PMID: 23528717 Review.
Cited by
-
The Micro Hand S vs. da Vinci Surgical Robot-Assisted Surgery on Total Mesorectal Excision: Short-Term Outcomes Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Front Surg. 2021 May 11;8:656270. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.656270. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34046424 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial gastrectomy combined with endoscopy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with intraluminal growth: a report of two cases.J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Nov 3;2022(11):rjac416. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac416. eCollection 2022 Nov. J Surg Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 36340599 Free PMC article.
-
Viewpoint matters: objective performance metrics for surgeon endoscope control during robot-assisted surgery.Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1192-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5090-8. Epub 2016 Jul 15. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27422247 Free PMC article.
-
Enabling single-site laparoscopy: the SPORT platform.Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3696-3703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06658-x. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30623255 Free PMC article.
-
The first robotic kidney transplantation in Korea: a case report.Korean J Transplant. 2022 Mar 31;36(1):61-66. doi: 10.4285/kjt.21.0023. Korean J Transplant. 2022. PMID: 35769429 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources