Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns
- PMID: 25628079
- PMCID: PMC4347410
- DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.046-053.oar
Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the Björk and Jabarak cephalometric analysis generated from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) synthesized lateral cephalograms in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.
Methods: The sample consisted of 46 CBCT synthesized cephalograms obtained from patients between 16 and 40 years old. A Björk and Jarabak cephalometric analysis among different sagittal skeletal classes was performed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), multiple range test of Tukey, Kruskal-Wallis test, and independent t-test were used as appropriate.
Results: In comparison to the standard values: Skeletal Class III had increased gonial and superior gonial angles (P < 0.001). This trend was also evident when sex was considered. For Class I males, the sella angle was decreased (P = 0.041), articular angle increased (P = 0.027) and gonial angle decreased (P = 0.002); whereas for Class III males, the gonial angle was increased (P = 0.012). For Class I females, the articular angle was increased (P = 0.029) and the gonial angle decreased (P = 0.004). Björk's sum and Björk and Jabarak polygon sum showed no significant differences. The facial biotype presented in the three sagittal classes was mainly hypodivergent and neutral.
Conclusions: In this sample, skeletal Class III malocclusion was strongly differentiated from the other sagittal classes, specifically in the mandible, as calculated through Björk and Jarabak analysis.
OBJETIVO:: o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a análise cefalométrica de Björk-Jarabak realizada com base em telerradiografias sintetizadas a partir de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC) em adultos com diferentes padrões esqueléticos sagitais.
MÉTODOS:: a amostra foi composta de 46 telerradiografias sintetizadas a partir de TCFC obtidas de pacientes entre 16 e 40 anos de idade. A análise cefalométrica de Björk-Jarabak foi conduzida entre as diferentes classes esqueléticas sagitais. Análise de variância (ANOVA), teste de Tukey, de Kruskal-Wallis e teste t independente também foram realizados.
RESULTADOS:: em comparação a valores padrão, a má oclusão de Classe III esquelética apresentava ângulos goníacos aumentados (p < 0,001). Essa tendência também foi evidente quando o sexo dos pacientes foi considerado. Pacientes Classe I do sexo masculino tiveram o ângulo sela diminuído (p = 0,041), o ângulo articular aumentado (p = 0,027) e o ângulo goníaco também diminuído (p = 0,002). Já os pacientes Classe III tiveram o ângulo goníaco aumentado (p = 0,012). Pacientes Classe I do sexo feminino tiveram o ângulo articular aumentado (p = 0,029) e o ângulo goníaco diminuído (p = 0,004). A soma de Björk e a soma dos polígonos de Björk-Jarabak não revelaram diferenças significativas. O biótipo facial presente nas três classes sagitais foi hipodivergente e neutro.
CONCLUSÕES:: na amostra do presente estudo, a má oclusão esquelética de Classe III foi fortemente diferenciada de outras classes sagitais, principalmente na mandíbula, conforme demonstrado pela análise de Björk-Jarabak.
Figures
References
-
- Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Hyun Park J, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, et al. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwartz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(3):262. e1–262. 11. - PubMed
-
- Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32(4):229–234. - PubMed
-
- Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(2):257–265. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
