Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jan 12:5:770.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770. eCollection 2014.

Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations

Affiliations
Review

Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations

Jodi Woan-Fei Law et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

The incidence of foodborne diseases has increased over the years and resulted in major public health problem globally. Foodborne pathogens can be found in various foods and it is important to detect foodborne pathogens to provide safe food supply and to prevent foodborne diseases. The conventional methods used to detect foodborne pathogen are time consuming and laborious. Hence, a variety of methods have been developed for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens as it is required in many food analyses. Rapid detection methods can be categorized into nucleic acid-based, biosensor-based and immunological-based methods. This review emphasizes on the principles and application of recent rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Detection methods included are simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and oligonucleotide DNA microarray which classified as nucleic acid-based methods; optical, electrochemical and mass-based biosensors which classified as biosensor-based methods; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay which classified as immunological-based methods. In general, rapid detection methods are generally time-efficient, sensitive, specific and labor-saving. The developments of rapid detection methods are vital in prevention and treatment of foodborne diseases.

Keywords: LAMP; NASBA; PCR; detection; foodborne; pathogens; rapid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adzitey F., Rusul G., Huda N., Cogan T., Corry J. (2012). Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and RAPD typing of Campylobacter species isolated from ducks, their rearing and processing environments in Penang, Malaysia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 154, 197–205 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akbulut D., Grant K. A., McLauchlin J. (2004). Development and application of real-time PCR assays to detect fragments of the Clostridium botulinum types A, B, and E neurotoxin genes for investigation of human foodborne and infant botulism. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 1, 247–257 10.1089/fpd.2004.1.247 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Khaldi S. F. (2002). DNA microarray technology used for studying foodborne pathogens and microbial habitats: minireview. J. AOAC Int. 85, 906–910. - PubMed
    1. Alves J., Marques V. V., Pereira L. F. P., Hirooka E. Y., Moreira de Oliveira T. C. R. (2012). Multiplex PCR for the detection of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in chicken meat. J. Food Safety 32, 345–350 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2012.00386.x - DOI
    1. Aschfalk A., Mülller W. (2002). Clostridium perfringens toxin types from wild caught Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)., determined by PCR and ELISA. Can. J. Microbiol. 48, 365–368. 10.1139/w02-015 - DOI - PubMed