Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations
- PMID: 25628612
- PMCID: PMC4290631
- DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770
Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations
Abstract
The incidence of foodborne diseases has increased over the years and resulted in major public health problem globally. Foodborne pathogens can be found in various foods and it is important to detect foodborne pathogens to provide safe food supply and to prevent foodborne diseases. The conventional methods used to detect foodborne pathogen are time consuming and laborious. Hence, a variety of methods have been developed for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens as it is required in many food analyses. Rapid detection methods can be categorized into nucleic acid-based, biosensor-based and immunological-based methods. This review emphasizes on the principles and application of recent rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Detection methods included are simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and oligonucleotide DNA microarray which classified as nucleic acid-based methods; optical, electrochemical and mass-based biosensors which classified as biosensor-based methods; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay which classified as immunological-based methods. In general, rapid detection methods are generally time-efficient, sensitive, specific and labor-saving. The developments of rapid detection methods are vital in prevention and treatment of foodborne diseases.
Keywords: LAMP; NASBA; PCR; detection; foodborne; pathogens; rapid.
Similar articles
-
Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens: Current Perspective and Challenges.Foods. 2023 Jul 23;12(14):2795. doi: 10.3390/foods12142795. Foods. 2023. PMID: 37509887 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent developments in detection and enumeration of waterborne bacteria: a retrospective minireview.Microbiologyopen. 2016 Dec;5(6):901-922. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.383. Epub 2016 Jul 10. Microbiologyopen. 2016. PMID: 27397728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nucleic acid amplification-based strategy to detect foodborne pathogens in milk: a review.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(16):5398-5413. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2154073. Epub 2022 Dec 8. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024. PMID: 36476145 Review.
-
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A novel rapid detection platform for pathogens.Microb Pathog. 2017 Jun;107:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Mar 18. Microb Pathog. 2017. PMID: 28323152 Review.
-
Advances in rapid detection methods for foodborne pathogens.J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Mar 28;24(3):297-312. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1310.10013. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014. PMID: 24375418 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Bacterial Load and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from Ready-to-Eat Raw Beef in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia.Int J Microbiol. 2021 Mar 25;2021:5560596. doi: 10.1155/2021/5560596. eCollection 2021. Int J Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33833808 Free PMC article.
-
Waterborne pathogens: detection methods and challenges.Pathogens. 2015 May 21;4(2):307-34. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4020307. Pathogens. 2015. PMID: 26011827 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Flow-Through Electrochemical Biosensor for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes Using Oligonucleotides.Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 28;21(11):3754. doi: 10.3390/s21113754. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34071528 Free PMC article.
-
A smartphone microscopic method for simultaneous detection of (oo)cysts of Cryptosporidium and Giardia.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 8;14(9):e0008560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008560. eCollection 2020 Sep. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020. PMID: 32898180 Free PMC article.
-
Boosting the Electrochemical Performance of PI-5-CA/C-SWCNT Nanohybrid for Sensitive Detection of E. coli O157:H7 From the Real Sample.Front Chem. 2022 Feb 10;10:843859. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.843859. eCollection 2022. Front Chem. 2022. PMID: 35223774 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adzitey F., Rusul G., Huda N., Cogan T., Corry J. (2012). Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and RAPD typing of Campylobacter species isolated from ducks, their rearing and processing environments in Penang, Malaysia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 154, 197–205 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Akbulut D., Grant K. A., McLauchlin J. (2004). Development and application of real-time PCR assays to detect fragments of the Clostridium botulinum types A, B, and E neurotoxin genes for investigation of human foodborne and infant botulism. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 1, 247–257 10.1089/fpd.2004.1.247 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Khaldi S. F. (2002). DNA microarray technology used for studying foodborne pathogens and microbial habitats: minireview. J. AOAC Int. 85, 906–910. - PubMed
-
- Alves J., Marques V. V., Pereira L. F. P., Hirooka E. Y., Moreira de Oliveira T. C. R. (2012). Multiplex PCR for the detection of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in chicken meat. J. Food Safety 32, 345–350 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2012.00386.x - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources