Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 29:15:28.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1441-y.

The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada

Aisha Lofters  1   2   3 , Mandana Vahabi  4   5 , Richard H Glazier  6   7   8
Affiliations

The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada

Aisha Lofters et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Self-report may not be an accurate method of determining cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening rates due to recall, acquiescence and social desirability biases, particularly for certain sociodemographic groups. Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the validity of self-report of cancer screening in Ontario, Canada, both for people in the general population and for socially disadvantaged groups based on immigrant status, ethnicity, education, income, language ability, self-rated health, employment status, age category (for cervical cancer screening), and gender (for fecal occult blood testing).

Methods: We linked multiple data sources for this study, including the Canadian Community Health Survey and provincial-level health databases. Using administrative data as our gold standard, we calculated validity measures for self-report (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values), calculated report-to-record ratios, and conducted a multivariable regression analysis to determine which characteristics were independently associated with over-reporting of screening.

Results: Specificity was less than 70% overall and for all subgroups for cervical and breast cancer screening, and sensitivity was lower than 80% overall and for all subgroups for fecal occult blood testing FOBT. Report-to-record ratios were persistently significantly greater than 1 across all cancer screening types, highest for the FOBT group: 1.246 [1.189-1.306]. Regression analyses showed no consistent patterns, but sociodemographic characteristics were associated with over-reporting for each screening type.

Conclusions: We have found that in Ontario, as in other jurisdictions, there is a pervasive tendency for people to over-report their cancer screening histories. Sociodemographic status also appears to influence over-reporting. Public health practitioners and policymakers need to be aware of the limitations of self-report and adjust their methods and interpretations accordingly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Report-to-record ratios for cervical cancer screening.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Report-to-record ratios for breast cancer screening.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Report-to-record ratios for fecal occult blood testing.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Duarte-Franco E, Franco EL. Cancer of the uterine cervix. BMC Womens Health. 2004;4(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-4-S1-S13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franco EL, Duarte-Franco E, Ferenczy A. Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection. CMAJ. 2001;164(7):1017–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics2006, Toronto, Canada, 2006.
    1. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health C. Tonelli M, Connor Gorber S, Joffres M, Dickinson J, Singh H, et al. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40–74 years. CMAJ. 2011;183(17):1991–2001. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkins K, Shields M. Colorectal cancer testing in Canada--2008. Health reports / Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Health Information = Rapports sur la sante / Statistique Canada, Centre canadien d’information sur la sante. 2009;20(3):21–30. - PubMed

Publication types