Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Sep;24(9):2831-2837.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3430-6. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with implant-free tibial fixation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with implant-free tibial fixation

Sylvio Noronha Sacramento et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: This case-series outcome study presents a surgical technique for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with 4-tunnel using two interference screws. There was a 2-year minimum follow-up.

Methods: From January to December 2009, an ACL 4-tunnel, anatomic, double-bundle reconstruction was performed on 27 patients. Double-strand hamstring tendon grafts were used in each femoral tunnel as well as two interference screws. Tibial fixation was insured through manual tension, by tying non-absorbable sutures on the bone bridge between the two tunnels at 20° of knee flexion. Clinical assessments included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores, range of motion (ROM), pivot-shift test, single-leg hop, and quadriceps-hamstrings strength tests using a hand-held dynamometer. Anterior knee laxity was also assessed using a rolimeter. A single examiner performed all testing pre-operatively at 6 months and during the 2-year follow-up.

Results: All patients were assessed during the 2-year follow-up. At that time, 92 % of the patients presented normal anterior laxity (average, 1.3 ± 0.5 mm) and rotational knee stability. No statistical side-to-side difference was found for ROM, muscle strength, single-leg hop, and function (n.s.). All patients presented a normal knee function according to the IKDC and the Lysholm score. In addition, no infection, graft failure, or pain were observed at the harvesting site.

Conclusion: The study shows that satisfactory results in relation to knee laxity, function, and strength can be achieved with the implant-free tibial fixation in the ACL double-bundle reconstruction with two interference screws.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

Keywords: ACL; Knee; Reconstruction; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(4):515–520 - PubMed
    1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N (2010) Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38(1):25–34 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander JW, Gold JE, Icenogle KD, Noble PC, Lowe WR (2010) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: kinematics and knee flexion angle-graft tension relation. Arthroscopy 26:202–213 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asagumo H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y et al (2007) Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using double-bundle hamstring tendons: surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy 23(6):602–606 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J (2004) Ability of a new hop test to determine functional déficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:350–355 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources