Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;24(5):618-34.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.12286. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs

A J L King  1 , M Evans  1 , T H M Moore  1 , C Paterson  1 , D Sharp  1 , R Persad  2 , A L Huntley  1
Affiliations

Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs

A J L King et al. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, accounting for an estimated 1.1 million new cases diagnosed in 2012 (www.globocan.iarc.fr). Currently, there is a lack of specific guidance on supportive care for men with prostate cancer. This article describes a qualitative systematic review and synthesis examining men's experience of and need for supportive care. Seven databases were searched; 20 journal articles were identified and critically appraised. A thematic synthesis was conducted in which descriptive themes were drawn out of the data. These were peer support, support from partner, online support, cancer specialist nurse support, self-care, communication with health professionals, unmet needs (emotional support, information needs, support for treatment-induced side effects of incontinence and erectile dysfunction) and men's suggestions for improved delivery of supportive care. This was followed by the development of overarching analytic themes which were: uncertainty, reframing, and the timing of receiving treatment, information and support. Our results show that the most valued form of support men experienced following diagnosis was one-to-one peer support and support from partners. This review highlights the need for improved access to cancer specialist nurses throughout the care pathway, individually tailored supportive care and psychosexual support for treatment side effects.

Keywords: peer support; prostate cancer; qualitative synthesis; specialist nurse; supportive care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arrington M. (2003) ‘I don't want to be an artificial man’: narrative reconstruction of sexuality among prostate cancer survivors. Sexuality and Culture 7, 30–58.
    1. Bailey D.E., Wallace M. & Mishel M.H. (2007) Watching, waiting and uncertainty in prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing 16, 734–741. - PubMed
    1. Boehmer U. & Babayan R.K. (2005) A pilot study to determine support during the pre‐treatment phase of early prostate cancer. Psycho‐Oncology 14, 442–449. - PubMed
    1. Broom A. (2005) The eMale. Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. Journal of Sociology 41, 87–104.
    1. Carter R., Bryant‐Lukosius D., DiCenso A., Blythe J. & Neville A.J. (2011) The supportive care needs of men with advanced prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 38, 189–198. - PubMed

Publication types