Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;24(11):1439-47.
doi: 10.1002/pon.3752. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Cancer-related internet information communication between oncologists and patients with breast cancer: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Cancer-related internet information communication between oncologists and patients with breast cancer: a qualitative study

Megan Johnson Shen et al. Psychooncology. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Many patients with cancer search out information about their cancer on the internet, thus affecting their relationship with their oncologists. An in-depth analysis of patient-physician communication about information obtained from the internet is currently lacking.

Methods: We audio-recorded visits of patients with breast cancer and their oncologists where internet information was expected to be discussed. Inductive thematic text analysis was used to identify qualitative themes from these conversations.

Results: Twenty-one patients self-reported discussing cancer-related internet information (CRII) with their oncologists; 16 audio recordings contained detectable discussions of CRII and were analyzed. Results indicated that oncologists and patients initiated CRII discussions implicitly and explicitly. Oncologists responded positively to patient-initiated CRII discussions by (1) acknowledging their limited expertise/knowledge, (2) encouraging/approving using the internet as an information resource, (3) providing information/guidance on the proper use of internet searches, (4) discussing the pros and cons of relevant treatment options, or (5) giving information. Finally, patients reacted to the CRII discussions by (1) indicating that they only used reputable sources/websites, (2) asking for further explanation of information, (3) expressing continued concern, or (4) asking for the oncologist's opinion or recommendation.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the majority of patients introduce internet information implicitly, in order to guard against any threat to their self-esteem. Physicians, in turn, seem to respond in a supportive fashion to reduce any threat experienced. Future interventions may consider providing prescription-based guidance on how to navigate the internet as a health information resource and to encourage patients to bring these topics up with their oncologist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flowchart for recruitment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pew Forum Pew Internet and American Life Project. 2013 (Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/
    1. Basch EM, Thaler HT, Shi W, Yakren S, Schrag D. Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions. Cancer. 2004;100(11):2476–2483. - PubMed
    1. Monnier J, Laken M, Carter CL. Patient and caregiver interest in internet-based cancer services. Cancer Pract. 2002;10(6):305–310. - PubMed
    1. Ranson S, Morrow GR, Dakhil S, et al. Internet use among 1020 cancer patients assessed in community practices: a URCC CCOP study. Paper presented at: Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003
    1. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, et al. A multi-institutional study of internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(4):1201–1205. - PubMed

Publication types