Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 16;54(12):3692-6.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201410247. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Probing bis-Fe(IV) MauG: experimental evidence for the long-range charge-resonance model

Affiliations

Probing bis-Fe(IV) MauG: experimental evidence for the long-range charge-resonance model

Jiafeng Geng et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

The biosynthesis of tryptophan tryptophylquinone, a protein-derived cofactor, involves a long-range reaction mediated by a bis-Fe(IV) intermediate of a diheme enzyme, MauG. Recently, a unique charge-resonance (CR) phenomenon was discovered in this intermediate, and a biological, long-distance CR model was proposed. This model suggests that the chemical nature of the bis-Fe(IV) species is not as simple as it appears; rather, it is composed of a collection of resonance structures in a dynamic equilibrium. Here, we experimentally evaluated the proposed CR model by introducing small molecules to, and measuring the temperature dependence of, bis-Fe(IV) MauG. Spectroscopic evidence was presented to demonstrate that the selected compounds increase the decay rate of the bis-Fe(IV) species by disrupting the equilibrium of the resonance structures that constitutes the proposed CR model. The results support this new CR model and bring a fresh concept to the classical CR theory.

Keywords: charge resonance; electronic structure; heme proteins; high-valence iron; near-infrared spectroscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural orientation of the hemes and the intervening tryptophan residue (PDB entry: 3L4M). The distance between the two iron ions and the edge-to-edge distances between the aromatic moieties are labelled.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Type III CR in bis-Fe(IV) MauG. (a) Proposed resonance structures in the Type III CR model. “H” represents a third aromatic moiety (i.e., the Trp93 residue in this case), which functions as a hopping relay to facilitate ET between the two primary aromatic moieties. The two resonance structures (Cpd ES* and Cpd I*) that can be potentially targeted by small molecule ligands are highlighted with a grey background. (b) Specific targeting of Cpd ES* and Cpd I* by CN to disrupt the Type III CR in the bis-Fe(IV) species.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Disruption of bis-Fe(IV) MauG by small molecule ligands. (a) Addition of CN accelerated the decay of the NIR band of bis-Fe(IV) MauG. CN was added immediately after bis-Fe(IV) formation. The solid lines are fits of the data to single-exponential decay. (b) Effect of different small molecule ligands on the decay of the NIR band. Each small molecule ligand (25 mM) was added immediately after bis-Fe(IV) formation. (c) Decay rates of the NIR band in the absence and presence of small molecule ligands.
Figure 4
Figure 4
EPR spectra of MauG. Gray trace: as-isolated di-ferric MauG; black trace: MauG + 25 mM CN; blue trace: MauG + 1× H2O2; red trace: MauG + 1× H2O2 (frozen 75 s after reaction); green trace: MauG + 1× H2O2 + 25 mM CN (CN was added immediately after addition of H2O2 and the sample was frozen 75 s after addition of CN). The arrows indicate the CN adduct of Heme5C at g = 3.37.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Temperature effect on the decay rate of the NIR band of bis-Fe(IV) MauG. The bis-Fe(IV) species was generated by addition of a stoichiometric amount of H2O2 to di-ferric MauG (15 μM). The data were fit to the Arrhenius equation (solid trace) to calculate the activation energy (Ea) and to the Marcus equation (dashed line) to calculate the reorganization energy (λ) of the ET reaction, respectively.

References

    1. Badger B, Brocklehurst B. Nature. 1968;219:263. - PubMed
    1. Heckmann A, Lambert C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:326–392;. - PubMed
    2. Agnew Chem. 2012;124:334–404.
    1. Geng J, Dornevil K, Davidson VL, Liu A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:9639–9644. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kochi JK, Rathore R, Magueres PL. J Org Chem. 2000;65:6826–6836. - PubMed
    1. Takai A, Gros CP, Barbe JM, Guilard R, Fukuzumi S. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:3110–3122. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources