Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jan 28;21(4):1061-8.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1061.

Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation

Giacomo Germani et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

The evaluation of the immunosuppression state in liver transplanted patients is crucial for a correct post-transplant management and a major step towards the personalisation of the immunosuppressive therapy. However, current immunological monitoring after liver transplantation relies mainly on clinical judgment and on immunosuppressive drug levels, without a proper assessment of the real suppression of the immunological system. Various markers have been studied in an attempt to identify a specific indicator of graft rejection and graft acceptance after liver transplantation. Considering acute rejection, the most studied markers are pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines and other proteins related to inflammation. However there is considerable overlap with other conditions, and only few of them have been validated. Standard liver tests cannot be used as markers of graft rejection due to their low sensitivity and specificity and the weak correlation with the severity of histopathological findings. Several studies have been performed to identify biomarkers of tolerance in liver transplanted patients. Most of them are based on the analysis of peripheral blood samples and on the use of transcriptional profiling techniques. Amongst these, NK cell-related molecules seem to be the most valid marker of graft acceptance, whereas the role CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells has still to be properly defined.

Keywords: Acute cellular rejection; Biomarkers; Liver transplantation; Tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O’Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, Castaing D, Neuhaus P, Jamieson N, Salizzoni M, et al. Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) J Hepatol. 2012;57:675–688. - PubMed
    1. Verhelst XP, Troisi RI, Colle I, Geerts A, van Vlierberghe H. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: A review. Hepatol Res. 2013;43:165–178. - PubMed
    1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:89–95. - PubMed
    1. Prieto M, Berenguer M, Rayón JM, Córdoba J, Argüello L, Carrasco D, García-Herola A, Olaso V, De Juan M, Gobernado M, et al. High incidence of allograft cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection following transplantation: relationship with rejection episodes. Hepatology. 1999;29:250–256. - PubMed
    1. Slapak GI, Saxena R, Portmann B, Gane E, Devlin J, Calne R, Williams R. Graft and systemic disease in long-term survivors of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1997;25:195–202. - PubMed

MeSH terms