Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0117334.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117334. eCollection 2015.

Estimating the clinical and economic benefit associated with incremental improvements in sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C

Affiliations

Estimating the clinical and economic benefit associated with incremental improvements in sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C

Phil McEwan et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the principle causes of chronic liver disease. Successful treatment significantly decreases the risk of hepatic morbidity and mortality. Current standard of care achieves sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 40-80%; however, the HCV therapy landscape is rapidly evolving. The objective of this study was to quantify the clinical and economic benefit associated with increasing levels of SVR.

Methods: A published Markov model (MONARCH) that simulates the natural history of hepatitis C over a lifetime horizon was used. Discounted and non-discounted life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost of complication management were estimated for various plausible SVR rates. To demonstrate the robustness of projections obtained, the model was validated to ten UK-specific HCV studies.

Results: QALY estimates ranged from 18.0 years for those treated successfully in fibrosis stage F0 to 7.5 years (discounted) for patients in fibrosis stage F4 who remain untreated. Predicted QALY gains per 10% improvement in SVR ranged from 0.23 (F0) to 0.64 (F4) and 0.58 (F0) to 1.35 (F4) in 40 year old patients (discounted and non-discounted results respectively). In those aged 40, projected discounted HCV-related costs are minimised with successful treatment in F0/F1 (at approximately £ 300), increasing to £ 49,300 in F4 patients who remain untreated. Validation of the model to published UK cost-effectiveness studies produce R2 goodness of fit statistics of 0.988, 0.978 and of 0.973 for total costs, QALYs and incremental cost effectiveness ratios, respectively.

Conclusion: Projecting the long-term clinical and economic consequences associated with chronic hepatitis C is a necessary requirement for the evaluation of new treatments. The principle analysis demonstrates the significant impact on expected costs, LYs and QALYs associated with increasing SVR. A validation analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results reported.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: PM, TW, SW and HB are employed by HEOR Ltd., which received funding support in the form of a grant from BMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The funding agreement ensured PM, TW, SW and HB’s independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. Authors YY, AK and MB are employed by BMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and critically reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content and appropriate interpretation of findings. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the MONARCH model.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Estimated per-patient life expectancy stratified by age, discounting, current fibrosis stage and SVR.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Estimated per-patient QALYs stratified by age, discounting, current fibrosis stage and SVR.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Estimated per patient costs (£000s) related specifically to HCV related complications (excluding any HCV therapy costs) stratified by age, discounting, fibrosis stage and SVR.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Predicted ICER values utilizing the MONARCH cost-effectiveness model compared to original study-specific ICER values as reported in 8 UK cost-effectiveness studies [,,,,–44].
Fig 6
Fig 6. Predicted rates of liver-related mortality (validation to [26, 27]) (left) and all-cause mortality (UK life tables) (right) as estimated by the MONARCH model.

References

    1. Coon JT, Rogers G, Hewson P, Wright D, Anderson R, et al. (2008) Surveillance of cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost–utility analysis. Br J Cancer 98: 1166–1175. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Public Health England (2014). Hepatits C in the UK: 2014 report. Available: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hepatitis-c-in-the-uk. Accessed October 2014.
    1. Esteban JI, Sauleda S, Quer J (2008) The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Europe. J Hepatol 48: 148–162. - PubMed
    1. Public Health England (2014). Commissioning template for estimating HCV prevalence by DAT and numbers eligible for treatment. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140714084352/http://www.hpa..... Accessed October 2014.
    1. European Association For The Study Of The Liver (2014) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 60: 392–420. 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources