Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Mar;47(3):457-64.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0916-1. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

Efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for overactive bladder in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for overactive bladder in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wei Huang et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for treating overactive bladder in adult.

Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized placebo-controlled trials of imidafenacin for the treatment of OAB. The search included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE. The reference lists of retrieved studies were also investigated.

Results: Five publications involving a total of 1,428 patients were used in the analysis, which compared imidafenacin with propiverine and solifenacin. We found that imidafenacin was effective in treating OAB in our meta-analysis, which was similar to propiverine in its efficacy. The mean number of UI per week (the standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.23, 95% CI -0.19 to 2.65, p = 0.09), the mean number of urgency episodes per day (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.63, p = 0.17), the mean number of micturitions per day (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.31, p = 0.96), and the mean urine volume (ml) per micturition (SMD = -13.04, 95% CI -20.45 to -5.62, p = 0.0006) indicated that imidafenacin was similar to propiverine in its efficacy. Mean OABSS (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI -0.08 to 1.03, p = 0.09) indicated that imidafenacin was also similar to solifenacin in its efficacy. Besides, imidafenacin was better tolerated than propiverine in the safety, indicated by dry mouth (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.98, p = 0.04) and any adverse events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.88, p = 0.006). Moreover, imidafenacin was also better tolerated than solifenacin in the safety, indicated by constipation (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53, p = 0.001) and any adverse events (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.71, p = 0.004).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that imidafenacin was similar to propiverine or solifenacin in its efficacy for OAB and was better tolerated than propiverine or solifenacin in the safety for OAB. We conclude that imidafenacin is preferable to propiverine or solifenacin from a perspective of safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jul;19(4):380-94 - PubMed
    1. Urol Int. 2003;71(3):290-8 - PubMed
    1. World J Urol. 2003 May;20(6):327-36 - PubMed
    1. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78 - PubMed
    1. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):567-85 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources