Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1989 Feb;26(2):83-5.
doi: 10.1136/jmg.26.2.83.

Prenatal exclusion testing for Huntington's disease: a problem of too much information

Affiliations
Case Reports

Prenatal exclusion testing for Huntington's disease: a problem of too much information

F A Millan et al. J Med Genet. 1989 Feb.

Abstract

At eight weeks of pregnancy a couple were informed that the prospective father's mother had died of Huntington's disease (HD). There were no living affected members in the immediate family to confirm the diagnosis. By inspection of the local genetic register, it was established that it was indeed HD segregating in the extended family. Genotyping of the prospective mother and father, the father's unaffected father, and his unaffected maternal grandmother was carried out using a battery of polymorphic DNA markers, including a new probe which has a very low recombination rate with the HD locus. Analysis of DNA from a chorionic villus sample taken at 10 weeks of pregnancy showed that the fetus must have inherited a chromosome from its father's affected mother. Its risk of developing HD was 47%. If the genotype of the unaffected maternal grandmother was taken into account, the risk was reduced to 42%. Neither risk was considered acceptable by the prospective parents and the pregnancy was terminated at 12 weeks' gestation. Prospects for future pregnancies are good, with a 50% chance of having a child whose risk of inheriting the HD gene is less than 1.5%. In retrospect it was noted that although genotyping of the maternal grandmother had refined the fetal risk, it had also nearly contributed to an inadvertent and unwanted predictive test for HD on the father. This case makes the point that in prenatal exclusion testing, linkage information must be generated with considerable care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Mar;36(2):460-5 - PubMed
    1. J Med Genet. 1974 Jun;11(2):145-51 - PubMed
    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Apr;3(4):1101-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):314-31 - PubMed
    1. Ann Hum Genet. 1981 Oct;45(Pt 4):375-85 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances