Complete response at first chemoembolization is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma
- PMID: 25637785
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022
Complete response at first chemoembolization is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
Backgrounds & aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significances of not only the initial and the best response during repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but if eligible, also the time point of achieving treatment responses.
Methods: Three hundred and fourteen treatment-naïve patients with well-preserved liver function undergoing TACE were recruited. Treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis.
Results: After adjusting other variables, objective response (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) as the initial response (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.410) and the best response (adjusted HR 0.335) had independent prognostic significances for OS, respectively (both p < 0.001). Objective responders as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by patients who subsequently achieved objective response after at least two sessions and those who did not achieve objective response during treatment course eventually (52.6, 27.0, and 10.8 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Likewise, patients with CR as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by those who subsequently achieved CR after at least two sessions and those who achieved PR as the best response (70.2, 40.6, and 23.0 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Large (>5 cm) and multiple (⩾ 4) tumors were independently associated with failure to achieve CR after the initial TACE (both p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Both the initial and the best response predicts OS effectively. However, achievement of treatment response at an early time point is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcomes.
Keywords: Best response; Chemoembolization; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Initial response; Prognosis.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply to "The problem of the most appropriate curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. When to embolize? When to operate?".J Hepatol. 2015 Jul;63(1):281-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 14. J Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25881539 No abstract available.
-
The problem of the most appropriate curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. When to embolize? When to operate?J Hepatol. 2015 Jul;63(1):280-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.053. Epub 2015 Apr 15. J Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25889807 No abstract available.
-
Response assessment for HCC patients treated with repeated TACE: The optimal time-point is still an open issue.J Hepatol. 2015 Dec;63(6):1530-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Aug 6. J Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 26256436 No abstract available.
-
Reply to "Response assessment for HCC patients treated with repeated TACE: The optimal time-point is still an open issue".J Hepatol. 2015 Dec;63(6):1532. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 12. J Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 26375243 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous