Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 2;10(2):e0115557.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115557. eCollection 2015.

Perception of everyday sounds: a developmental study of a free sorting task

Affiliations

Perception of everyday sounds: a developmental study of a free sorting task

Aurore Berland et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: The analysis of categorization of everyday sounds is a crucial aspect of the perception of our surrounding world. However, it constitutes a poorly explored domain in developmental studies. The aim of our study was to understand the nature and the logic of the construction of auditory cognitive categories for natural sounds during development. We have developed an original approach based on a free sorting task (FST). Indeed, categorization is fundamental for structuring the world and cognitive skills related to, without having any need of the use of language. Our project explored the ability of children to structure their acoustic world, and to investigate how such structuration matures during normal development. We hypothesized that age affects the listening strategy and the category decision, as well as the number and the content of individual categories.

Design: Eighty-two French children (6-9 years), 20 teenagers (12-13 years), and 24 young adults participated in the study. Perception and categorization of everyday sounds was assessed based on a FST composed of 18 different sounds belonging to three a priori categories: non-linguistic human vocalizations, environmental sounds, and musical instruments.

Results: Children listened to the sounds more times than older participants, built significantly more classes than adults, and used a different strategy of classification. We can thus conclude that there is an age effect on how the participants accomplished the task. Analysis of the auditory categorization performed by 6-year-old children showed that this age constitutes a pivotal stage, in agreement with the progressive change from a non-logical reasoning based mainly on perceptive representations to the logical reasoning used by older children. In conclusion, our results suggest that the processing of auditory object categorization develops through different stages, while the intrinsic basis of the classification of sounds is already present in childhood.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of the center of gravity of the sounds and frequency bands, ranging by frequency from low to high (scaled in log to base 10).
Circles represent non-linguistic human vocalizations, square musical instruments, and diamond environmental sounds.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Average number of sounds listening as a function of age and of the a priori category.
There are a significant differences between age groups and categories.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Average number of classes as a function of age of the participants.
Standard deviations are depicted for each age group. Significant differences between age groups are represented by the brackets and astericks (representing p<.05).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Illustration of the two main central partitions performed by participants, independent of the age.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Proportions of Central Partitions 1 and 2 performed by the subjects according to their age.
The other types of partitions have been grouped together (labeled “Others Partitions”).
Fig 6
Fig 6. Additive trees showing both similarity and differences across sounds as function of age.
The shorter is the line connecting two sounds, the more the sounds are judged similar.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kail M, Fayol M (2000) L’acquisition du langage, tome 1: Le langage en émergence De la naissance à trois ans. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.10.027 - DOI
    1. Trawick-Smith J (2003) Early childhood development: A multicultural perspective 3rd ed. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall;
    1. Bergelson E, Swingley D (2012) At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 3253–3258. 10.1073/pnas.1113380109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jusczyk PW, Aslin RN (1995) Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive psychology 29: 1–23. - PubMed
    1. Kuhl PK (2004) Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5: 831–843. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources