Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;61(5):1643-50.
doi: 10.1002/hep.27704. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States

Affiliations

Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States

Julie K Heimbach et al. Hepatology. 2015 May.

Abstract

The current system granting liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) additional Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) points is controversial due to geographic disparity and uncertainty regarding optimal prioritization of candidates. The current national policy assigns a MELD exception score of 22 immediately upon listing of eligible patients with HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of delays in granting these exception points on transplant rates for HCC and non-HCC patients. We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data and liver simulated allocation modeling software and modeled (1) a 3-month delay before granting a MELD exception score of 25, (2) a 6-month delay before granting a score of 28, and (3) a 9-month delay before granting a score of 29. Of all candidates waitlisted between January 1 and December 31, 2010 (n = 28,053), 2773 (9.9%) had an HCC MELD exception. For HCC candidates, transplant rates would be 108.7, 65.0, 44.2, and 33.6 per 100 person-years for the current policy and for 3-, 6-, and 9-month delays, respectively. Corresponding rates would be 30.1, 32.5, 33.9, and 34.8 for non-HCC candidates.

Conclusion: A delay of 6-9 months would eliminate the geographic variability in the discrepancy between HCC and non-HCC transplant rates under current policy and may allow for more equal access to transplant for all candidates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Panel A. Median match MELD at liver transplant and the gap in transplant rates between HCC and non-HCC patients by region. In regions where patients undergo transplant at lower MELD scores, the disparity between HCC and non-HCC patients was larger than in high MELD regions. Each dot represents one of the 11 OPTN regions. Panel B. Effect of 6- and 9-month delays in application of HCC exception scores on the gap in transplant rates between HCC and non-HCC patients by region. The negative correlation seen in Panel A is no longer apparent. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; OPTN, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

References

    1. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–699. - PubMed
    1. Sharma P, Harper AM, Hernandez JL, Heffron T, Mulligan DC, Wiesner RH, et al. Reduced priority MELD score for hepatocellular carcinoma does not adversely impact candidate survival awaiting liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1957–1962. - PubMed
    1. Wiesner RH, Freeman RB, Mulligan DC. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: the impact of the MELD allocation policy. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S261–S267. - PubMed
    1. Washburn K, Edwards E, Harper A, Freeman R. Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1643–1648. - PubMed
    1. Massie AB, Caffo B, Gentry SE, Hall EC, Axelrod DA, Lentine KL, et al. MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2362–2371. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types