Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;213(1):46.e1-46.e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making

Tessa Madden  1 , Gina M Secura  2 , Robert F Nease  3 , Mary C Politi  4 , Jeffrey F Peipert  2
Affiliations

The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making

Tessa Madden et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Contraceptive methods have differing attributes. Women's preferences for these attributes may influence contraceptive decision making. Our objective was to identify women's contraceptive preferences among women initiating a new contraceptive method.

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-administered survey of women's contraceptive preferences at the time of enrollment into the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Participants were asked to rank the importance of 15 contraceptive attributes on a 3-point scale (1 = not at all important, 2 = somewhat important, and 3 = very important) and then to rank the 3 attributes that were the most important when choosing a contraceptive method. The survey also contained questions about prior contraceptive experience and barriers to contraceptive use. Information about demographic and reproductive characteristics was collected through the CHOICE Project baseline survey.

Results: There were 2590 women who completed the survey. Our sample was racially and socioeconomically diverse. Method attributes with the highest importance score (mean score [SD]) were effectiveness (2.97 [0.18]), safety (2.96 [0.22]), affordability (2.61 [0.61]), whether the method is long lasting (2.58 [0.61]), and whether the method is "forgettable" (2.54 [0.66]). The attributes most likely to be ranked by respondents among the top 3 attributes included effectiveness (84.2%), safety (67.8%), and side effects of the method (44.6%).

Conclusion: Multiple contraceptive attributes influence decision making and no single attribute drives most women's decisions. Tailoring communication and helping women make complex tradeoffs between attributes can better support their contraceptive decisions and may assist them in making value-consistent choices. This process could improve continuation and satisfaction.

Keywords: contraceptive attributes; contraceptive decision making; contraceptive implant; intrauterine device; preference-sensitive decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: G.M.S. reports no potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat. 2010;23(29):1–44. - PubMed
    1. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25–30. - PubMed
    1. Lessard LN, Karasek D, Ma S, et al. Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2012;44(3):194–200. - PubMed
    1. Mansour D. International survey to assess women's attitudes regarding choice of daily versus nondaily female hormonal contraception. International journal of women's health. 2014;6:367–375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donnelly KZ, Foster TC, Thompson R. What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making. Contraception. 2014 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances