Limitations of dormant conduction as a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence and pulmonary vein reconnection after catheter ablation

Abstract

Background: Adenosine (ADO) can uncover dormant conduction following pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. We sought to identify the value of dormant conduction for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and chronic PV reconnection.

Methods: One hundred fifty-two patients (80 male; age 60 ± 11 years) undergoing PV isolation for AF were studied. After PV isolation, sites of ADO-induced PV reconnection were recorded and targeted with additional ablation. In patients undergoing repeat ablation for recurrent AF, chronic PV reconnection was assessed.

Results: Forty-five (30%) patients had ADO-induced PV reconnection following PV isolation. Dormant conduction was successfully eliminated with additional ablation in 41 (91%) of these patients. After follow-up of 598 ± 270 days, 60 (39%) patients had recurrent AF. Dormant PV conduction was not a significant predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval: 0.89-2.56; P = 0.12) although three of four (75%) patients with residual dormant conduction following initial ablation developed recurrent AF. Twenty-six patients with recurrent AF underwent repeat ablation with 52 of 99 (53%) PVs found to have chronic reconnection. Nine of 11 (82%) PVs with dormant conduction and 43 of 88 (49%) PVs without dormant conduction at initial procedure had chronic reconnection at repeat ablation.

Conclusions: When additional ablation is performed to eliminate ADO-induced PV reconnection after PV isolation, dormant conduction is not a significant predictor of recurrent AF. Although PVs with dormant conduction at initial procedure may develop chronic reconnection, the majority of PVs that show conduction recovery at repeat ablation occur in nondormant PVs.

Keywords: ablation; atrial fibrillation; electrophysiology-clinical.