Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;19(2):253-63.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12342. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

Trust, temporality and systems: how do patients understand patient safety in primary care? A qualitative study

Affiliations

Trust, temporality and systems: how do patients understand patient safety in primary care? A qualitative study

Penny Rhodes et al. Health Expect. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Patient safety research has tended to focus on hospital settings, although most clinical encounters occur in primary care, and to emphasize practitioner errors, rather than patients' own understandings of safety.

Objective: To explore patients' understandings of safety in primary care.

Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients recruited from general practices in northwest England. Participants were asked basic socio-demographic information; thereafter, topics were largely introduced by interviewees themselves. Transcripts were coded and analysed using NVivo10 (qualitative data software), following a process of constant comparison.

Results: Thirty-eight people (14 men, 24 women) from 19 general practices in rural, small town and city locations were interviewed. Many of their concerns (about access, length of consultation, relationship continuity) have been discussed in terms of quality, but, in the interviews, were raised as matters of safety. Three broad themes were identified: (i) trust and psycho-social aspects of professional-patient relationships; (ii) choice, continuity, access, and the temporal underpinnings of safety; and (iii) organizational and systems-level tensions constraining safety.

Discussion: Conceptualizations of safety included common reliance on a bureaucratic framework of accreditation, accountability, procedural rules and regulation, but were also individual and context-dependent. For patients, safety is not just a property of systems, but personal and contingent and is realized in the interaction between doctor and patient. However, it is the systems approach that has dominated safety thinking, and patients' individualistic and relational conceptualizations are poorly accommodated within current service organization.

Keywords: general practice; patient safety; patients' perceptions; primary care; systems; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tang N, Meyer GS. Ambulatory patient safety: the time is now. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2010; 170: 1487–1489. - PubMed
    1. National Center for Health Statistics . Tables 91 and 100 in Health, United States,2009: With Special Feature on Medical Technology. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010. - PubMed
    1. Hill A, Freeman G. Promoting Continuity of Care in General Practice, RCGP Policy Paper, March 2011. London: The Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011.
    1. Dovey SM, Meyers DS, Phillips RL Jr et al A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2002; 11: 233–238. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gertler SA, Zlatan C, López A, Stein J, Sarkar U. Root cause analysis of ambulatory adverse drug events that present to the emergency department. Journal of Patient Safety, 2014; Published ahead of print. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000072. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types