Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 10;33(11):1331-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.049. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Adolescent decision making about participation in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial

Affiliations

Adolescent decision making about participation in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial

Andreia B Alexander et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the process of adolescent decision-making about participation in an HIV vaccine clinical trial, comparing it to adult models of informed consent with attention to developmental differences.

Methods: As part of a larger study of preventive misconception in adolescent HIV vaccine trials, we interviewed 33 male and female 16-19-year-olds who have sex with men. Participants underwent a simulated HIV vaccine trial consent process, and then completed a semistructured interview about their decision making process when deciding whether or not to enroll in and HIV vaccine trial. An ethnographic content analysis approach was utilized.

Results: Twelve concepts related to adolescents' decision-making about participation in an HIV vaccine trial were identified and mapped onto Appelbaum and Grisso's four components of decision making capacity including understanding of vaccines and how they work, the purpose of the study, trial procedures, and perceived trial risks and benefits, an appreciation of their own situation, the discussion and weighing of risks and benefits, discussing the need to consult with others about participation, motivations for participation, and their choice to participate.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that most adolescents at high risk for HIV demonstrate the key abilities needed to make meaningful decisions about HIV vaccine clinical trial participation.

Keywords: Adolescent; Decision making; HIV vaccine trial; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Main questions from interview guide used for analysis of decision making among adolescents regarding participation in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Model of decision making among adolescents regarding participation in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States 2007–2010. HIV surveillance supplemental report. 2012;17
    1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, Paris R, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2209–20. - PubMed
    1. Gray GE, Allen M, Moodie Z, Churchyard G, Bekker LG, Nchabeleng M, et al. Safety and efficacy of the HVTN 503/Phambili study of a clade-B-based HIV-1 vaccine in South Africa: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled test-of-concept phase 2b study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(7):507–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pettifor A, Bekker LG, Hosek S, DiClemente R, Rosenberg M, Bull SS, et al. Preventing HIV among young people: research priorities for the future. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(Suppl. 2):S155–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abma JC, Martinez GM, Copen CE. Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, national survey of family growth 2006–2008. Vital Health Stat. 2010;23(30):1–47. - PubMed

Publication types