Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140090.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0090.

Neural overlap in processing music and speech

Affiliations
Review

Neural overlap in processing music and speech

Isabelle Peretz et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Neural overlap in processing music and speech, as measured by the co-activation of brain regions in neuroimaging studies, may suggest that parts of the neural circuitries established for language may have been recycled during evolution for musicality, or vice versa that musicality served as a springboard for language emergence. Such a perspective has important implications for several topics of general interest besides evolutionary origins. For instance, neural overlap is an important premise for the possibility of music training to influence language acquisition and literacy. However, neural overlap in processing music and speech does not entail sharing neural circuitries. Neural separability between music and speech may occur in overlapping brain regions. In this paper, we review the evidence and outline the issues faced in interpreting such neural data, and argue that converging evidence from several methodologies is needed before neural overlap is taken as evidence of sharing.

Keywords: fMRI; music; neural overlap; speech.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of a Google Scholar search. The search was performed on 11 July 2014 using the keywords ‘(neural) AND (overlap OR sharing) AND (music) AND (language OR speech)’, with the number of search results plotted per year (non-cumulative).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Statistical map showing voxels within the temporal lobe with stronger responses to musical stimuli than to human voice (including speech). (b) Left and right cluster-averaged parameter estimates, showing that responses to speech were smaller than to music but were significantly larger compared with human non-vocal stimuli (all pairwise comparisons significant, p < 0.005). Data from Angulo-Perkins [22]. (Online version in colour.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Honing H, ten Cate C, Peretz I, Trehub SE. 2015. Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140088 (10.1098/rstb.2014.0088) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Juslin PN. 2001. Communication emotion in music performance: a review and a theoretical framework. In Music and emotion: theory and research (eds Juslin PN, Sloboda JA.), pp. 309–337. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. Sperber D, Hirschfeld LA. 2004. The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 40–46. (10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jackendoff R. 2009. Parallels and nonparallels between language and music. Music Percept. 26, 195–204. (10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.195) - DOI
    1. Peretz I. 2006. The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition 100, 1–32. (10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.004) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources