Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Apr;212(4):539.e1-539.e24.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b)

Affiliations
Observational Study

A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b)

David M Haas et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of the "Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be" is to determine maternal characteristics, which include genetic, physiologic response to pregnancy, and environmental factors that predict adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Study design: Nulliparous women in the first trimester of pregnancy were recruited into an observational cohort study. Participants were seen at 3 study visits during pregnancy and again at delivery. We collected data from in-clinic interviews, take-home surveys, clinical measurements, ultrasound studies, and chart abstractions. Maternal biospecimens (serum, plasma, urine, cervicovaginal fluid) at antepartum study visits and delivery specimens (placenta, umbilical cord, cord blood) were collected, processed, and stored. The primary outcome of the study was defined as pregnancy ending at <37+0 weeks' gestation. Key study hypotheses involve adverse pregnancy outcomes of spontaneous preterm birth, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction.

Results: We recruited 10,037 women to the study. Basic characteristics of the cohort at screening are reported.

Conclusion: The "Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be" cohort study methods and procedures can help investigators when they plan future projects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01322529.

Keywords: adverse pregnancy outcome; cohort study; methods; nulliparous; prediction; pregnancy; psychosocial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest related to this project.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cross-sections of placental specimens relative to the 1 cm inner diameter of a 2 mL cryovial. Specimens should not press against the inner wall of the cryovial; where liquid medium is used, specimens should be surrounded by the medium. These requirements are satisfied by an 8 mm diameter punch biopsy (panel A) or a scalpel cut specimen with cross-sectional dimensions between 0.7 × 0.7 cm (panel B) and 0.5 × 0.5 cm (panel C). Obtained with a depth of 1 cm, these correspond to a specimen volume of 0.5 cubic cm (panel A) or between 0.5 cubic cm (panel B) and 0.25 cubic cm (panel C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Locations for collection of placenta and umbilical cord samples. Shown are the locations for the ideal delivery collection. (For the standard delivery collection, ignore the locations for specimens for RNA, protein/metabolites, and DNA/epigenetics, which are obtained only under ideal collection.) Locations for the placenta samples other than for histology are shown with dashed lines, because the sample is to be taken to a depth of 1.3 cm and then 3 mm from the top (i.e., the fetal side) is to be trimmed, resulting in a sample from the interior of the placental thickness, with final length of 1 cm.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Allostatic Load and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.
    Lueth AJ, Allshouse AA, Blue NM, Grobman WA, Levine LD, Simhan HN, Kim JK, Johnson J, Wilson FA, Murtaugh M, Silver RM; National Institutes of Health (NIH), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b), and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) nuMoM2b Heart Health Study (nuMoM2b-HHS). Lueth AJ, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec 1;140(6):974-982. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004971. Epub 2022 Nov 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 36357956 Free PMC article.
  • Association of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes With Hypertension 2 to 7 Years Postpartum.
    Haas DM, Parker CB, Marsh DJ, Grobman WA, Ehrenthal DB, Greenland P, Bairey Merz CN, Pemberton VL, Silver RM, Barnes S, McNeil RB, Cleary K, Reddy UM, Chung JH, Parry S, Theilen LH, Blumenthal EA, Levine LD, Mercer BM, Simhan H, Polito L, Wapner RJ, Catov J, Chen I, Saade GR; NHLBI nuMoM2b Heart Health Study. Haas DM, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013092. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013092. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31564189 Free PMC article.
  • High early pregnancy body mass index is associated with alterations in first- and second-trimester angiogenic biomarkers.
    Beck C, Allshouse A, Silver RM, Grobman WA, Simhan H, Haas D, Reddy UM, Blue NR. Beck C, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 May;4(3):100614. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100614. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022. PMID: 35283347 Free PMC article.
  • Body Mass Index, Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk.
    Khan SS, Petito LC, Huang X, Harrington K, McNeil RB, Bello NA, Bairey Merz CN, Miller EC, Ravi R, Scifres C, Catov JM, Pemberton VL, Varagic J, Zee PC, Yee LM, Ray M, Kim JK, Lane-Cordova AD, Lewey J, Theilen LH, Saade GR, Greenland P, Grobman WA; NICHD nuMoM2b and NHLBI nuMoM2b Heart Health Study Networks. Khan SS, et al. Circ Res. 2023 Oct 13;133(9):725-735. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.322762. Epub 2023 Oct 10. Circ Res. 2023. PMID: 37814889 Free PMC article.
  • Derivation and assessment of a sex-specific fetal growth standard.
    Blue NR, Allshouse AA, Heerboth S, Grobman W, Mercer B, Shanks A, Bregand-White JM, Simhan H, Reddy UM, Saade G, Parry S, Silver RM. Blue NR, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9913-9921. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2075696. Epub 2022 May 22. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 35603475 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman M, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Nat Vital Stat Rep. Vol. 62 Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Vital Statistics; 2013. Births: Final data for 2012. - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–72. - PubMed
    1. Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, et al. Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet. 2013;381:223–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:964–73. - PubMed
    1. North RA, McCowan LM, Dekker GA, et al. Clinical risk prediction for pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: development of model in international prospective cohort. Bmj. 2011;342:d1875. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data