Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015;44(5):20140422.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140422. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

A new in vitro method to evaluate radio-opacity of endodontic sealers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A new in vitro method to evaluate radio-opacity of endodontic sealers

V B Malka et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a new method for assessing the radio-opacity of endodontic sealers and to compare radio-opacity values with a well-established standard method.

Methods: The sealers evaluated in this study were AH Plus(®) (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), Endo CPM Sealer (EGEO SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and MTA Fillapex(®) (Angelus Dental Products Industry S/A, Londrina, Parana, Brazil). Two methods were used to evaluate radio-opacity: (D) standard discs and (S) a tissue simulator. For (D), ten standard discs were prepared for each sealer and were radiographed using Digora(®) phosphor storage plates (Soredex; Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland), alongside an aluminium stepwedge. For (S), polyethylene tubes filled with sealer (n = 10 for each) were radiographed inside the simulator as described. The digital images were analysed using Adobe Photoshop(®) software v. 10.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). To compare the radio-opacity among the sealers, the data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey's test, and to compare methods, they were analysed by the Mann-Whitney U test. To compare the data obtained from dentin and sealers in method (S), Student's paired t-test was used (=0.05).

Results: In both methods, the sealers showed significant differences, according to the following decreasing order: AH Plus, MTA Fillapex and Endo CPM. In (D), MTA Fillapex and Endo CPM showed less radio-opacity than aluminium. For all of the materials, the radio-opacity was higher in (S) than in (D). Compared with dentin, all of the materials were more radio-opaque.

Conclusions: The comparison of the two assessment methods for sealer radio-opacity testing validated the use of a tissue simulator block.

Keywords: dental; dental materials; radiography; root canal therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of the images in Adobe Photoshop® software v. 10.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). Std Dev, standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Image illustrating the differences between methods considering each material, showing higher radio-opacity in the tissue simulator than in standard discs: (a) AH Plus® (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany); (b) MTA Fillapex® (Angelus Dental Products Industry S/A, Londrina, Parana, Brazil); and (c) Endo CPM (EGEO SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina).

References

    1. McComb D, Smith DC. Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate-based and conventional root canal sealers. J Endod 1976; 2: 228–35. - PubMed
    1. Borges AH, Pedro FL, Semanoff-Segundo A, Miranda CE, Pécora JD, Cruz Filho AM. Radiopacity evaluation of Portland and MTA-based cements by digital radiographic system. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 228–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Organization for Standardization ISO 6876: dental root canal sealing materials. 2nd edn. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2001.
    1. American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA specification no. 57—endodontic sealing material. Chicago, IL: ADA; 2000.
    1. Beyer-Olsen EM, Orstavik D. Radiopacity of root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 51: 320–8. - PubMed

Publication types