Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;19(2):141-53.
doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0565-6.

Systematic review of strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials for non-pharmacological interventions in mild cognitive impairment: focus on Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

Systematic review of strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials for non-pharmacological interventions in mild cognitive impairment: focus on Alzheimer's disease

T Horr et al. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Non-pharmacological interventions may improve cognition and quality of life, reduce disruptive behaviors, slow progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to dementia, and delay institutionalization. It is important to look at their trial designs as well as outcomes to understand the state of the evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's disease (AD). An analysis of trial design strengths and limitations may help researchers clarify treatment effect and design future studies of non-pharmacological interventions for MCI related to AD.

Methods: A systematic review of the methodology of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) targeting physical activity, cognitive interventions, and socialization among subjects with MCI in AD reported until March 2014 was undertaken. The primary outcome was CONSORT 2010 reporting quality. Secondary outcomes were qualitative assessments of specific methodology problems.

Results: 23 RCT studies met criteria for this review. Eight focused on physical activity, fourteen on cognitive interventions, and one on the effects of socialization. Most studies found a benefit with the intervention compared to control. CONSORT reporting quality of physical activity interventions was higher than that of cognitive interventions. Reporting quality of recent studies was higher than older studies, particularly with respect to sample size, control characteristics, and methodology of intervention training and delivery. However, the heterogeneity of subjects identified as having MCI and variability in interventions and outcomes continued to limit generalizability.

Conclusions: The role for non-pharmacological interventions targeting MCI is promising. Future studies of RCTs for non-pharmacological interventions targeting MCI related to AD may benefit by addressing design limitations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Survey of physical, cognitive and socialization interventions. The number of subjects in each study relates to log circumference of point size
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean and Standard deviation of CONSORT 2010 rating across all three intervention types
Figure 3
Figure 3
CONSORT 2010 rating in physical intervention studies across years. The number of subjects in each study relates to log perimeter of marker size
Figure 4
Figure 4
CONSORT 2010 rating in cognitive intervention studies across years. The number of subjects in each study relates to log perimeter of marker size

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th. American Psychiatric Publishing; Arlington, VA: 2013. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 - DOI
    1. Mitchell A.J., Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia—meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119(4):252–265. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01326.x PubMed PMID: 19236314. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phelan E.A., Borson S., Grothaus L., Balch S., Larson E.B. Association of incident dementia with hospitalizations. JAMA. 2012;307(2):165–172. 10.1001/jama.2011.1964 PMCID 3312921; PubMed PMID: 22235087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maslow K. Dementia and serious coexisting medical conditions: a double whammy. Nurs Clin North Am. 2004;39(3):561–579. 10.1016/j.cnur.2004.02.011 PubMed PMID: 15331302. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinquart M., Sorensen S. Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects. Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;18(4):577–595. 10.1017/S1041610206003462 PubMed PMID: 16686964. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms