Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;11(2):20140977.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0977.

Stay or stray? Evidence for alternative mating strategy phenotypes in both men and women

Affiliations

Stay or stray? Evidence for alternative mating strategy phenotypes in both men and women

Rafael Wlodarski et al. Biol Lett. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

In all comparative analyses, humans always fall on the borderline between obligate monogamy and polygamy. Here, we use behavioural indices (sociosexuality) and anatomical indices (prenatal testosterone exposure indexed by 2D : 4D digit ratio) from three human populations to show that this may be because there are two distinct phenotypes in both sexes. While males are more promiscuous and display higher prenatal testosterone exposure than females overall, our analyses also suggest that the within-sex variation of these variables is best described by two underlying mixture models, suggesting the presence of two phenotypes with a monogamous/promiscuous ratio that slightly favours monogamy in females and promiscuity in males. The presence of two phenotypes implies that mating strategy might be under complex frequency-dependent selection.

Keywords: 2D : 4D; mating strategies; monogamy; promiscuity; sociosexuality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Modelled within-sex distribution mixtures of sociosexuality in British and North American samples, plotted against a histogram of the data. Curves display best-fit models estimating underlying mixture distributions: solid lines represent low-sociosexuality (restricted or monogamous) phenotype, dashed line high-sociosexuality (unrestricted or promiscuous) phenotype.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Modelled within-sex distribution mixtures of 2D : 4D ratio (reversed x-axis) in a British sample, plotted against a histogram of the data. Curves display best-fit models estimating underlying mixture distributions: solid lines representing low-testosterone (high-2D : 4D ratio) phenotype, dashed lines high-testosterone (low-2D : 4D ratio) phenotype.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harcourt AH, Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293, 55–57. (10.1038/293055a0) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson E, Rolian C, Cashmore L, Shultz S. 2011. Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1556–1563. (10.1098/rspb.2010.1740) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simpson JA, Gangestad SW. 1991. Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60, 870–883. (10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmitt DP. 2005. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 247–275; discussion 275–311 (10.1017/S0140525X05000051) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geary DC. 2000. Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychol. Bull. 126, 55–77. (10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources