Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke
- PMID: 25653225
- DOI: 10.1177/1545968315570325
Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke
Abstract
Background: Evidence supports peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation (FES) as an effective alternative to ankle foot orthoses (AFO) for treatment of foot drop poststroke, but few long-term, randomized controlled comparisons exist.
Objective: Compare changes in gait quality and function between FES and AFOs in individuals with foot drop poststroke over a 12-month period.
Methods: Follow-up analysis of an unblinded randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01087957) conducted at 30 rehabilitation centers comparing FES to AFOs over 6 months. Subjects continued to wear their randomized device for another 6 months to final 12-month assessments. Subjects used study devices for all home and community ambulation. Multiply imputed intention-to-treat analyses were utilized; primary endpoints were tested for noninferiority and secondary endpoints for superiority. Primary endpoints: 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and device-related serious adverse event rate. Secondary endpoints: 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), GaitRite Functional Ambulation Profile, and Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile (mEFAP).
Results: A total of 495 subjects were randomized, and 384 completed the 12-month follow-up. FES proved noninferior to AFOs for all primary endpoints. Both FES and AFO groups showed statistically and clinically significant improvement for 10MWT compared with initial measurement. No statistically significant between-group differences were found for primary or secondary endpoints. The FES group demonstrated statistically significant improvements for 6MWT and mEFAP Stair-time subscore.
Conclusions: At 12 months, both FES and AFOs continue to demonstrate equivalent gains in gait speed. Results suggest that long-term FES use may lead to additional improvements in walking endurance and functional ambulation; further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Keywords: ankle foot orthosis; foot drop; functional electrical stimulation; gait speed; quality of life; stroke rehabilitation.
© The Author(s) 2015.
Similar articles
-
The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):688-97. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521007. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014. PMID: 24526708 Clinical Trial.
-
Kinematic and kinetic benefits of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation in people with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(4):547-558. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180822. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29889089
-
Effects of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation on gait quality, energy expenditure, participation and user satisfaction in patients with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(6):795-807. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150501. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26484694
-
A systematic literature review of ankle-foot orthosis and functional electrical stimulation foot-drop treatments for persons with multiple sclerosis.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Aug 1;47(4):358-367. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000190. Epub 2022 Dec 27. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023. PMID: 36701192
-
Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve improves post-stroke gait speed when combined with physiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jan;64(1):101388. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 May 24. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 32376404
Cited by
-
Biomimetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Promotes the Rat Hindlimb Motion Modulation in Stepping: An Experimental Analysis.Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024 Jul 4;5:0131. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0131. eCollection 2024. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024. PMID: 38966124 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutic and orthotic effects of an adaptive functional electrical stimulation system on gait biomechanics in participants with stroke.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Mar 18;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01577-0. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40102928 Free PMC article.
-
Real-Time Estimation of Lower Limb Posture and Joint Angles Using Wearable IMUs: Reproduced Hemiparetic and Normal Gait.Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2024 May 30;16:19-29. doi: 10.11336/jjcrs.16.19. eCollection 2025. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2024. PMID: 40486669 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of soft robotic exoskeleton for gait training on clinical and biomechanical gait outcomes in patients with sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 2;14:1296102. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1296102. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 38020601 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Gluteus Medius during Gait in Patients following a Stroke.Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 19;2020:8659845. doi: 10.1155/2020/8659845. eCollection 2020. Biomed Res Int. 2020. PMID: 35721669 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous