Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jan 21:5:791.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00791. eCollection 2014.

Interactions of Salmonella with animals and plants

Affiliations
Review

Interactions of Salmonella with animals and plants

Agnès Wiedemann et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Salmonella enterica species are Gram-negative bacteria, which are responsible for a wide range of food- and water-borne diseases in both humans and animals, thereby posing a major threat to public health. Recently, there has been an increasing number of reports, linking Salmonella contaminated raw vegetables and fruits with food poisoning. Many studies have shown that an essential feature of the pathogenicity of Salmonella is its capacity to cross a number of barriers requiring invasion of a large variety of cells and that the extent of internalization may be influenced by numerous factors. However, it is poorly understood how Salmonella successfully infects hosts as diversified as animals or plants. The aim of this review is to describe the different stages required for Salmonella interaction with its hosts: (i) attachment to host surfaces; (ii) entry processes; (iii) multiplication; (iv) suppression of host defense mechanisms; and to point out similarities and differences between animal and plant infections.

Keywords: Salmonella infections; adhesion; host defense strategies; invasion mechanisms; multiplication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Transmission electron microscopy image showing fimbriae of S. Enteritidis after culture on Sven Gard plates. Bar represents 0.5 μm.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Models of Salmonella invasion mechanisms. Salmonella uses T3SS-1 to translocate effector proteins directly into host cells (left side; Bar of the transmission electron microscopy image represents 2 μm). Several of these effector proteins modulate host cell actin cytoskeleton, leading to an intense membrane ruffling and internalization of the bacteria into a modified phagosome or Salmonella-containing-vacuole (SCV). Salmonella can also invade cells via a T3SS-1-independent mechanism, which is induced by the Salmonella Rck membrane protein interacting with its receptor on the host cell plasma membrane and characterized by the induction of thin membrane extensions (right side; Bar of the transmission electron microscopy picture represents 1 μm). The membrane rearrangements induced by the Salmonella invasin PagN have not been studied yet.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Host cell markers present on the SCV (left) or on a phagosome (right). Comparison of the host cell markers, which characterize the classic endosome process and the biogenesis and maturation of the SCV (Figure modified from Bakowski et al., 2008).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Different behaviors of internalized Salmonella. The majority of Salmonella strains, internalized within an animal cell by the Trigger mechanism mediated by the T3SS-1, are enclosed in a canonical SCV where they can multiply, and form SIF, which allow delivery of nutrients. However, in some cases the bacteria do not have the time (or the capability) to modify the vacuole leading to the fusion of the SCV with phago-lysosome triggering intra-vacuole destruction or autophagy. In other cases, Salmonella damages the SCV membrane triggering vacuole destruction, allowing bacteria to escape into the cytosol, where they can be destroyed, particularly in activated macrophages, or multiply extensively especially in epithelial cells. No data have been obtained for the Zipper mechanism induced by Rck.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmer B. M., Gunn J. S. (2011). Interaction of Salmonella spp. with the intestinal microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2:101 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmer B. M., van Reeuwijk J., Timmers C. D., Valentine P. J., Heffron F. (1998). Salmonella Typhimurium encodes an SdiA homolog, a putative quorum sensor of the LuxR family, that regulates genes on the virulence plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 180 1185–1193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiastui A., Pucciarelli M. G., Garcia-del Portillo F. (2010). Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium invades fibroblasts by multiple routes differing from the entry into epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 78 2700–2713 10.1128/IAI.01389-09 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen-Vercoe E., Woodward M. J. (1999). The role of flagella, but not fimbriae, in the adherence of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis to chick gut explant. J. Med. Microbiol. 48 771–780 10.1099/00222615-48-8-771 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Althouse C., Patterson S., Fedorka-Cray P., Isaacson R. E. (2003). Type 1 fimbriae of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bind to enterocytes and contribute to colonization of swine in vivo. Infect. Immun. 71 6446–6452 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6446-6452.2003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed