Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;8(12):NC01-3.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8609.5229. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Efficacy of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) Score in Patients with Secondary Peritonitis

Affiliations

Efficacy of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) Score in Patients with Secondary Peritonitis

Muralidhar V A et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in diagnosis, management and critical care of patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation, prognosis remains poor. Early assessment by scoring systems will influence the management and prognosis.

Aim: Evaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score for predicting the outcome in patients with peritonitis.

Materials and methods: Prospective study of 50 patients admitted and operated for peritonitis in JSS Medical College Hospital. The structured scoring system i.e. MPI was applied along with other clinical and biochemical parameters recorded in pre-structured proforma. Data was analysed for predicting mortality and morbidity using EPI info and SPSS software.

Results: The overall mortality and morbidity was 14% and 38% respectively. MPI scores of ≤ 20, 21-29, and ≥ 30 had a mortality of 5%, 14%, and 50% respectively. MPI score of 25 had highest sensitivity of 72.09% and specificity of 71.43% in predicting mortality, 80.65% sensitivity and 57.89% specificity for morbidity. MPI score of > 25 were associated with 6.45 times higher risk of mortality (p=0.03), 5.72 times higher risk of morbidity (p=0.005) compared to patients with MPI score ≤ 25.

Conclusion: MPI is disease specific, easy scoring system for predicting the mortality in patients with secondary peritonitis. Increasing scores are associated with poorer prognosis, needs intensive management and hence it should be used routinely in clinical practice.

Keywords: Predictor; Scoring; Sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-3]:
[Table/Fig-3]:
Outcome distribution according to MPI score
[Table/Fig-4]:
[Table/Fig-4]:
ROC curve of sensitivity and specificity of MPI score for mortality

References

    1. Bohnen J, Boulanger M, Meakins JL, Mclean APH. Prognosis in generalized peritonitis: relation to cause and risk factors. Arch Surg. 1983;118:285–90. - PubMed
    1. Giessling U, Petersen S, Freitag M, Kleine-Kraneburg H, Ludwig K. Surgical management of severe peritonitis. Zentralbl Chir. 2002;127:594–97. - PubMed
    1. Farthmann EH, Schoffel U. Principles and limitations of operative management of intra-abdominal infections. World J Surg. 1990;14:210–17. - PubMed
    1. Ponting GA, Sim AJW, Dudley HAF. Comparison of local and systemic Sepsis in predicting survival. Br J Surg. 1987;74:75052. - PubMed
    1. Bion J. Outcome in Intensive care. BMJ. 1993;307:953–54. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources