Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:179867.
doi: 10.1155/2015/179867. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

The effect of CYP, GST, and SULT polymorphisms and their interaction with smoking on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

Affiliations

The effect of CYP, GST, and SULT polymorphisms and their interaction with smoking on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

Stefania Boccia et al. Biomed Res Int. 2015.

Abstract

Aim. The aim of our study was to assess whether selected single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and 2E1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and SULT1A1 influence susceptibility towards HCC, considering their interaction with cigarette smoking. Methods. We recruited HCC cases and controls among patients admitted to the hospital "Agostino Gemelli," from January 2005 until July 2010. Odds ratios (OR) of HCC were derived from unconditional multiple logistic regression. Gene-gene and gene-smoking interaction were quantified by computing the attributable proportion (AP) due to biological interaction. Results. The presence of any CYP2E1 (*) 5B variant allele (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.06-0.71) and CYP2E1 (*) 6 variant allele (OR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.33) was inversely related to HCC. There was a borderline increased risk among carriers of combined CYP1A1 (*) 2A and SULT1A1 variant alleles (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 0.97-3.24). A significant biological interaction was observed between GSTT1 and smoking (AP = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.001-0.815), with an OR of 3.13 (95% CI: 1.69-5.82), and borderline significant interaction was observed for SULT1A1 and smoking (AP = 0.36; 95% CI: -0.021-0.747), with an OR of 3.05 (95% CI: 1.73-5.40). Conclusion. CYP2E1 (*) 5B and CYP2E1 (*) 6 polymorphisms have a favourable effect on the development of HCC, while polymorphisms of GSTT1 and SULT1A1 might play role in increasing the susceptibility among smokers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Agency on Research of Cancer. 2012, http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
    1. op den Winkel M., Nagel D., Sappl J., et al. Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large Western HCC-Cohort. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045066.e45066 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chuang S., Vecchia C. L., Boffetta P. Liver cancer: descriptive epidemiology and risk factors other than HBV and HCV infection. Cancer Letters. 2009;286(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.10.040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franceschi S., Montella M., Polesel J., et al. Hepatitis viruses, alcohol, and tobacco in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2006;15(4):683–689. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0702. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turati F., Talamini R., Pelucchi C., et al. Metabolic syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma risk. British Journal of Cancer. 2013;108(1):222–228. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.492. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms