Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 5:5:8299.
doi: 10.1038/srep08299.

3D morphometric analysis of fossil canid skulls contradicts the suggested domestication of dogs during the late Paleolithic

Affiliations

3D morphometric analysis of fossil canid skulls contradicts the suggested domestication of dogs during the late Paleolithic

Abby Grace Drake et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Whether dogs were domesticated during the Pleistocene, when humans were hunter-gatherers, or during the Neolithic, when humans began to form permanent settlements and engage in agriculture, remains controversial. Recently discovered Paleolithic fossil skulls, Goyet dated 31,680 +/- 250 YBP and Eliseevichi MAE 447/5298 dated 13,905 +/- 55 YBP, were previously identified as dogs. However, new genetic studies contradict the identification of these specimens as dogs, questioning the validity of traditional measurements used to morphologically identify canid fossil skulls. We employ 3D geometric morphometric analyses to compare the cranial morphology of Goyet and Eliseevichi MAE to that of ancient and modern dogs and wolves. We demonstrate that these Paleolithic canids are definitively wolves and not dogs. Compared to mesaticephalic (wolf-like breeds) dog skulls, Goyet and Eliseevichi MAE, do not have cranial flexion and the dorsal surface of their muzzles has no concavity near the orbits. Morphologically, these early fossil canids resemble wolves, and thus no longer support the establishment of dog domestication in the Paleolithic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bivariate plots of Euclidean distance based cranial indices.
(a) Log10 total skull length versus Log10 viscerocranial length, (b) Log10 viscerocranial length versus Log10 greatest palate width (c) Log10 total skull length versus Log10 alveolar length, (d) Log10 viscerocranial length versus Log10 minimum palate width. Convex hulls of dogs, Alaskan wolves, and European wolves are outlined.
Figure 2
Figure 2. PCA of Euclidean distance based cranial indices.
(a) PC1 versus PC3, (b) PC2 versus PC3, (c) PC1 versus PC2. Convex hulls of dogs, Alaskan wolves, and European wolves are outlined.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bivariate plot of palate width versus total skull length.
Convex hulls of dogs, Alaskan wolves, and European wolves are outlined.
Figure 4
Figure 4. PCA plot of 36 form space coordinates.
(a) 3D plot of PC1, PC2 and PC3, (b) 3D morphs of extremes along PC 1, PC 2 and PC 3. 95% Confidence interval ellipsoids of modern dogs, Alaskan wolves, and European wolves are outlined. Unclassified specimens are labelled separately in this and other figures. A 3D version of this figure is available as Supplementary Figure S1.
Figure 5
Figure 5. 3D surface models of fossil specimens used in this analysis.
(a) Eliseevichi MAE 447/5298, (b) Goyet, (c) Shamanka II, (d) Trou Balleux, (e) Ust'-Belaia. A 3D version of this figure is available as Supplementary Figure S2.
Figure 6
Figure 6. PCA plot of 36 form space coordinates including classified fossil specimens.
(a) 3D plot of PC1, PC2 and PC3, (b) 3D morphs of extremes along PC 1, PC 2 and PC 3. 95% Confidence interval ellipsoids of modern dogs, Alaskan wolves and European wolves are outlined. Unclassified specimens are labelled separately in this and other figures. A 3D version of this figure is available as Supplementary Figure S3.

References

    1. Boudadi-Maligne M. & Escarguel G. A biometric re-evaluation of recent claims for Early Upper Palaeolithic wolf domestication in Eurasia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 45, 80–89 (2014).
    1. Freedman A. H. et al. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genetics 10, e1004016 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morey D. F. In search of Paleolithic dogs: a quest with mixed results. J. Archaeol. Sci. 52, 300–307 (2014).
    1. Thalmann O. et al. Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Ancient Canids Suggest a European Origin of Domestic Dogs. Science 342, 871–874 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Wang G. et al. The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans. Nat. Commun. 4, 1860 (2013). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources