Australasian disasters of national significance: an epidemiological analysis, 1900-2012
- PMID: 25656005
- DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12357
Australasian disasters of national significance: an epidemiological analysis, 1900-2012
Abstract
Background: A regional epidemiological analysis of Australasian disasters in the 20th century to present was undertaken to examine trends in disaster epidemiology; to characterise the impacts on civil society through disaster policy, practice and legislation; and to consider future potential limitations in national disaster resilience.
Methods: A surveillance definition of disaster was developed conforming to the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) criteria (≥10 deaths, ≥100 affected, or declaration of state emergency or appeal for international assistance). The authors then applied economic and legislative inclusion criteria to identify additional disasters of national significance.
Results: The surveillance definition yielded 165 disasters in the period, from which 65 emerged as disasters of national significance. There were 38 natural disasters, 22 technological disasters, three offshore terrorist attacks and two domestic mass shootings. Geographic analysis revealed that states with major population centres experienced the vast majority of disasters of national significance. Timeline analysis revealed an increasing incidence of disasters since the 1980s, which peaked in the period 2005-2009. Recent seasonal bushfires and floods have incurred the highest death toll and economic losses in Australasian history. Reactive hazard-specific legislation emerged after all terrorist acts and after most disasters of national significance.
Conclusion: Timeline analysis reveals an increasing incidence in natural disasters over the past 15 years, with the most lethal and costly disasters occurring in the past 3 years. Vulnerability to disaster in Australasia appears to be increasing. Reactive legislation is a recurrent feature of Australasian disaster response that suggests legislative shortsightedness and a need for comprehensive all-hazards model legislation in the future.
Keywords: disaster; disaster planning; emergency medicine; epidemiology.
© 2015 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.
Similar articles
-
One hundred years of railway disasters and recent trends.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Oct;26(5):367-73. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1100639X. Epub 2011 Sep 21. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011. PMID: 21939583
-
A comparative assessment of major international disasters: the need for exposure assessment, systematic emergency preparedness, and lifetime health care.BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3939-3. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28061835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perennial disaster patterns in Central Europe since 2000 and implications for hospital preparedness planning - a cross-sectional analysis.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84223-4. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39753701 Free PMC article.
-
Accident and disaster epidemiology.Public Health Rev. 1993-1994;21(3-4):243-53. Public Health Rev. 1993. PMID: 8047651 Review.
-
The social construction of disasters in the United States: A historical and cultural phenomenon.J Emerg Manag. 2017 May/Jun;15(3):175-187. doi: 10.5055/jem.2017.0326. J Emerg Manag. 2017. PMID: 28829530
Cited by
-
Improving Disaster Data Systems to Inform Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience Building in Australia: A Comparison of Databases.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Oct;36(5):511-518. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2100073X. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021. PMID: 34528503 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous