Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain
- PMID: 25659265
- DOI: 10.1159/000371583
Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnostic practice for acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department varies widely and is mostly based on doctor's preferences. We aimed at developing an evidence-based guideline for the diagnostic pathway of patients with abdominal pain of non-traumatic origin.
Methods: All available international literature on patients with acute abdominal pain was identified and graded according to their methodological quality by members of the multidisciplinary steering group. A guideline was synthetized, providing evidence-based recommendations together with considerations based on expertise of group members, patient preferences, costs, availability of facilities, and organizational aspects.
Definition: Uniform terminology is needed in patients with acute abdominal pain to avoid difficulty in interpretation and ease comparison of findings between studies. We propose the use of the following definition for acute abdominal pain: pain of nontraumatic origin with a maximum duration of 5 days. Clinical diagnosis: Clinical evaluation is advised to differentiate between urgent and nonurgent causes. The diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment is insufficient to identify the correct diagnosis but can discriminate between urgent and nonurgent causes. Patients suspected of nonurgent diagnoses can safely be reevaluated the next day. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the differences in accuracy between residents and specialists. No conclusions can be drawn on the influence of a gynecological consultation. In patients suspected of an urgent condition, additional imaging is justified. CRP and WBC count alone are insufficient to discriminate urgent from nonurgent diagnoses. Diagnostic imaging: There is no place for conventional radiography in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain due to the lack of added value on top of clinical assessment. Computed tomography leads to the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients with acute abdominal pain. Positive predictive value of ultrasound is comparable with CT and therefore preferred as the first imaging modality due to the downsides of computed tomography; negative or inconclusive ultrasound is followed by CT. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the added value of a diagnostic laparoscopy in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain. Antibiotic treatment should be started within the first hour after recognition of sepsis. Administration of opioids (analgesics) decreases the intensity of the pain and does not affect the accuracy of physical examination.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Tramadol or paracetamol do not effect the diagnostic accuracy of acute abdominal pain with significant pain relief - a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled double blind study.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Dec;16(14):1983-8. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012. PMID: 23242726 Clinical Trial.
-
[Guideline 'Diagnostics in acute abdominal pain in adults'].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7494. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014. PMID: 24893814 Review. Dutch.
-
Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): Design and rationale.BMC Emerg Med. 2007 Aug 6;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-7-9. BMC Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17683592 Free PMC article.
-
[Acute abdominal pain in the emergency department - a clinical algorithm for adult patients].Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Apr;136(2):118-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271415. Epub 2011 Mar 18. Zentralbl Chir. 2011. PMID: 21424993 Review. German.
-
Imaging modalities for acute abdominal pain.Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002 Mar;9(1):3-9. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002. PMID: 11979405
Cited by
-
The Diagnostic Process for the Evaluation of Acute Abdominal Pain by Resident Trainees in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study.Intern Med. 2020;59(10):1257-1265. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3526-19. Epub 2020 May 15. Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32418953 Free PMC article.
-
[Expectations of visceral surgeons from the results of clinical autopsies].Pathologe. 2017 Sep;38(5):361-364. doi: 10.1007/s00292-017-0317-6. Pathologe. 2017. PMID: 28660345 Review. German. No abstract available.
-
Imaging of non-traumatic acute abdominal pain in adults presenting to the emergency department.Saudi Med J. 2016 Mar;37(3):324-7. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.3.13068. Saudi Med J. 2016. PMID: 26905358 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Requirements of clinicians on pathology : A viewpoint from pathology].Pathologe. 2017 Sep;38(5):394-395. doi: 10.1007/s00292-017-0343-4. Pathologe. 2017. PMID: 28808773 German. No abstract available.
-
[Acute Pelvic pain in women-gynecological causes].Radiologe. 2019 Feb;59(2):126-132. doi: 10.1007/s00117-018-0475-4. Radiologe. 2019. PMID: 30519765 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous