Does the presence of a condition-specific obstetric protocol lead to detectable improvements in pregnancy outcomes?
- PMID: 25659468
- PMCID: PMC4485531
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.055
Does the presence of a condition-specific obstetric protocol lead to detectable improvements in pregnancy outcomes?
Abstract
Objective: We sought to evaluate whether the presence of condition-specific obstetric protocols within a hospital was associated with better maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Study design: This was a cohort study of a random sample of deliveries performed at 25 hospitals over 3 years. Condition-specific protocols were collected from all hospitals and categorized independently by 2 authors. Data on maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as data necessary for risk adjustment were collected. Risk-adjusted outcomes were compared according to whether the patient delivered in a hospital with condition-specific obstetric protocols at the time of delivery.
Results: Hemorrhage-specific protocols were not associated with a lower rate of postpartum hemorrhage or with fewer cases of estimated blood loss >1000 mL. Similarly, in the presence of a shoulder dystocia protocol, there were no differences in the frequency of shoulder dystocia or number of shoulder dystocia maneuvers used. Conversely, preeclampsia-specific protocols were associated with fewer intensive care unit admissions (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.44) and fewer cases of severe maternal hypertension (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.96).
Conclusion: The presence of condition-specific obstetric protocols was not consistently shown to be associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. Our study would suggest that the presence or absence of a protocol does not matter and regulations to require protocols are not fruitful.
Keywords: obstetrics; protocols; quality of care.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The use of postpartum hemorrhage protocols in United States academic obstetric anesthesia units.Anesth Analg. 2014 Oct;119(4):906-910. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000399. Anesth Analg. 2014. PMID: 25238236 Review.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes after bariatric surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis: do the benefits outweigh the risks?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29454871
-
Multidisciplinary In Situ Simulation-Based Training as a Postpartum Hemorrhage Quality Improvement Project.Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1762-e1766. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00030. Mil Med. 2017. PMID: 28290956
-
Maternal anemia and severe maternal morbidity in a US cohort.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Sep;3(5):100395. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100395. Epub 2021 May 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021. PMID: 33992832 Free PMC article.
-
[Quality of care to prevent and treat postpartum hemorrhage and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia : an observational assessment in Madagascar's hospitals].Med Sante Trop. 2013 May 1;23(2):168-75. doi: 10.1684/mst.2013.0161. Med Sante Trop. 2013. PMID: 23694783 French.
Cited by
-
Shoulder dystocia and composite adverse outcomes for the maternal-neonatal dyad.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100359. Epub 2021 Mar 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021. PMID: 33757935 Free PMC article.
-
From Postpartum Haemorrhage Guideline to Local Protocol: A Study of Protocol Quality.Matern Child Health J. 2016 Oct;20(10):2160-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2050-9. Matern Child Health J. 2016. PMID: 27395381 Free PMC article.
-
Avoiding late preterm deliveries to reduce neonatal complications: an 11-year cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1650-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29310615 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Obstetric Safety Through Best Practices.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Feb;30(2):265-269. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8878. Epub 2020 Nov 23. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021. PMID: 33227226 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Postpartum hemorrhage protocols and benchmarks: improving care through standardization.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Feb;5(2S):100740. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100740. Epub 2022 Sep 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 36058518 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bailit JL. Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2007;62:207–13. - PubMed
-
- Clark SL, Belfort MA, Byrum SL, et al. Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008;199:105.e1–7. - PubMed
-
- Clark SL, Frye DR, Meyers JA, et al. Reduction in elective delivery at <39 weeks of gestation: comparative effectiveness of 3 approaches to change and the impact on neonatal intensive care admission and stillbirth. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;203:449.e1–6. - PubMed
-
- Oshiro BT, Henry E, Wilson J, et al. Decreasing Elective Deliveries Before 39 Weeks of Gestation in an Integrated Health Care System. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009;113:804–11. - PubMed
-
- The Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative Writing Committee. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36 0/7 to 38 6/7 weeks’ gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;202:243.e1–43.e8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- HD36801/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD040500/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD027869/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD040544/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD040560/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD027915/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD040485/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD40560/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000439/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD040560/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD040512/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U01 HD036801/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD053118/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR024989/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR025764/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD034116/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD27869/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD53118/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD053097/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD40512/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD040544/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD034208/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD040512/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD40545/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD034116/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- 5UL1 RR025764/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- HD40485/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD21410/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD027869/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD027917/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD34116/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD027915/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD040545/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD040485/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD40500/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD034208/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD053097/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD34208/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD27915/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD040500/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD27917/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- P2C HD050924/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD021410/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U24 HD036801/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD036801/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD53097/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD040545/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- HD40544/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical